Trial reportBMC pediatrics2025
Efficacy of modified versus standard Valsalva maneuvers on clinical outcomes and satisfaction of children with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia: randomized control trial.
Trial report in BMC pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionValsalva maneuvers are the initial line in management of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia in hemodynamically stable children. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of modified versus standard Valsalva maneuvers on the clinical outcomes and satisfaction of children with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia.
methodsThe study used randomized controlled trial and recruited ninety children with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia from Pediatric Emergency Department and Pediatric Cardiac Intensive Care Unit at Tanta University Hospitals, El-Gharbia Governorate, Egypt. The researchers divided the studied children into three equal groups of thirty. A control group that received conventional hospital care, an intervention group I that received modified Valsalva maneuver plus conventional hospital care, and an intervention group II that received standard Valsalva maneuver plus conventional hospital care. The primary outcome was the return to sinus rhythm within the first 5 min of admission and the secondary outcomes were decreased dyspnea, decreased antiarrhythmic therapy use, length of stay time in hospital as well as children's satisfaction.
resultsMore than half (53.3%) of the children who received the modified Valsalva maneuver returned to sinus rhythm within the first five minutes post-implementation compared to 33.3% of the children who received the standard Valsalva maneuver. Children within modified Valsalva maneuver group had a mean satisfaction score of 25.56 ± 1.67 that was significantly higher than those in the standard Valsalva maneuver group's score of 20.10 ± 2.57 (P = 0.0001).
conclusionThe modified version of the Valsalva maneuver was significantly more effective than the standard Valsalva maneuver in terminating supraventricular tachycardia and improving children's clinical outcomes. This included a decrease in the degree of dyspnea within the first minute from severe to moderate and reducing the need for administering antiarrhythmic drugs for management of SVT episodes. Additionally, children in the MVM group had a higher mean satisfaction score than those in the SVM group, with highly statistically significant differences.
trial registrationPACTR202407479098909. Registered 15/07/2024.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.