SynthesisBMC public health2025
The global prevalence of uncontrolled hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sex Differences in Sleep Duration and Quality: Implications for Hypertension Risk.Current hypertension reports · 2026Review
- Review
- Dual residual risk of lipid and inflammation: a prospective analysis of RCII on hypertension incidence and cardiovascular prognosis in Chinese and UK populations.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Article
- Prevalence and factors associated with uncontrolled systolic blood pressure among treated older adults in Sri Lanka: a nationwide multicenter cross-sectional study.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a population-based prediction model for prevalent hypertension: evidence from Qatar biobank.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite available treatments, uncontrolled hypertension (systolic/diastolic blood pressure ≥ 140/90 mmHg despite medication) remains prevalent, contributing significantly to mortality. However, global estimates of its prevalence vary widely. We aimed to determine the pooled global prevalence of uncontrolled hypertension among hypertensive patients.
methodsWe performed a systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched using a predesigned search strategy up to August 2024. The cross-sectional studies which reported the prevalence of uncontrolled hypertension prevalence in adults were included. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed bias risk using the JBI checklist. The heterogeneity was evaluated using I² statistics. The inverse variance method was used in meta-analysis, and the random-effects model at a 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to the report of the results.
resultsOut of 3,500 identified references, 200 studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in this review. The global pooled prevalence of uncontrolled hypertension was 54.6% (95% CI: 52.1–57.1; I² = 99.97%). In the WHO African region, the Americas, South-East Asia, European region, Eastern Mediterranean, and the Western Pacific Region the pooled prevalence was 59.4% (95% CI: 54.4, 64.5; I²=97.11%); 49.7% (95% CI: 42.4, 56.9; I² = 99.98%); 44.2% (95% CI: 35.6, 52.7; I² = 99.86%); 53.7% (95% CI: 49.8, 57.7; I² = 99.89%); 60.0% (95% CI: 54.1, 65.8; I² = 99.47%); and 58.8% (95% CI: 51.5, 66.0; I² = 99.96%) respectively.
conclusionBased on the results of this systematic review and meta-analysis, the global prevalence of uncontrolled hypertension was high. Based on the WHO regions, the highest and lowest prevalence was related to Eastern Mediterranean and South-East Asia respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.