ArticleBMC primary care2025
Opportunistic offer of human papillomavirus (HPV) self-testing in ethnically diverse primary care clinics in Aotearoa New Zealand: an implementation study.
Article in BMC primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- The role of community pharmacies in the provision of human papillomavirus (HPV) self-testing: A range of delivery models and proof-of-concept study.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2026Article
- Clinician and patient experiences with opportunistic offer of HPV self-testing in Aotearoa New Zealand primary care clinics: interview and survey findings.BMC primary care · 2026Article
- Untimely follow-up after cervical cancer screening: A qualitative study among healthcare providers in Flanders (Belgium).PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHuman papillomavirus (HPV) self-testing was introduced in Aotearoa New Zealand in September 2023, with the potential to improve screening access and reduce inequities for priority populations: Māori, Pacific, and those overdue for screening by ≥ 2 years (underscreened). To contribute towards informing this change, we tested the implementation of offering the self-test opportunistically in primary care (with a take-home option) with follow-up by a central nursing team.
methodsTrained general practice clinicians offered HPV self-tests to eligible people aged 30–69 years who attended for any reason between November 2021 and September 2023. Six clinics were selected for high proportions of priority populations. The central team reminded participants to return samples (if tested at home), and notified and managed HPV results via telehealth.
resultsOf 9,292 potentially eligible people, 37.9% (n = 3,524) were self-tested. A lower rate of self-testing was seen in all priority populations: 34.7% in Māori and 36.3% in Pacific vs. 40.4% in European/Other (p < 0.01, p < 0.05, respectively), and 32.2% in underscreened vs. 52.3% in those < 6 months overdue (due) (p < 0.001). In the 16.8% of participants who took self-test kits home (n = 635), 61.1% (n = 388) returned a sample. Priority populations were more likely to take a test kit home: 22.2% of Māori and 20.0% of Pacific vs. 12.1% of European/Other, and 21.5% of underscreened vs. 11.7% of due (all p < 0.001). Although a similar return rate was seen in Māori (64.3%) vs. European/Other (70.3%), fewer Pacific (51.1% vs. 70.3% in European/Other; p < 0.05) and underscreened (48.7% vs. 89.4% in due; p < 0.001) returned their sample. HPV was detected in 9.5% of 3,524 returned results. Follow-up testing rates were high (96.4% for cytology; 92.8% for colposcopy).
conclusionsOpportunistically offering HPV self-tests in primary care engaged priority populations in cervical screening. Intensive support is required to achieve high rates of sample return (if tested at home) and follow-up where HPV was detected. Opportunistic offer of HPV self-testing in primary care should be considered as an important component of a broader strategy to increase equitable participation in cervical screening, with more focus needed for Māori, Pacific and those who are underscreened.
trial registrationThis study did not reach the ICJME or WHO criteria for clinical trial registration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.