Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41408509›Full record

ArticleBMC primary care2025

Opportunistic offer of human papillomavirus (HPV) self-testing in ethnically diverse primary care clinics in Aotearoa New Zealand: an implementation study.

Karen Bartholomew, Lily P H Yang, Cleo Neville, Anna Maxwell, Phyu Sin Aye, Jane Grant, Collette Bromhead, Georgina McPherson, Kate Moodabe, Richard Massey and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Karen BartholomewHealth Gain Development, Planning, Funding and Outcomes, Health New Zealand | Te Whatu Ora, Q4 Building, Level 2, Smales Farm, 74 Taharoto Road, Takapuna, Auckland, 0622, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-1517-2134
Lily P H YangHealth Gain Development, Planning, Funding and Outcomes, Health New Zealand | Te Whatu Ora, Q4 Building, Level 2, Smales Farm, 74 Taharoto Road, Takapuna, Auckland, 0622, New Zealand. lily.yang@TeWhatuOra.govt.nz.ORCID 0009-0000-6565-1312
Cleo NevilleHealth Gain Development, Planning, Funding and Outcomes, Health New Zealand | Te Whatu Ora, Q4 Building, Level 2, Smales Farm, 74 Taharoto Road, Takapuna, Auckland, 0622, New Zealand.ORCID 0009-0003-6552-9992
Anna MaxwellHealth Gain Development, Planning, Funding and Outcomes, Health New Zealand | Te Whatu Ora, Q4 Building, Level 2, Smales Farm, 74 Taharoto Road, Takapuna, Auckland, 0622, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-4155-0255
Phyu Sin AyeHealth Gain Development, Planning, Funding and Outcomes, Health New Zealand | Te Whatu Ora, Q4 Building, Level 2, Smales Farm, 74 Taharoto Road, Takapuna, Auckland, 0622, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-9356-9965
Jane GrantChild, Youth and Women, Planning, Funding and Outcomes, Health New Zealand | Te Whatu Ora, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-2365-400X
Collette BromheadMolecular Pathology, School of Health Sciences, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-2890-2191
Georgina McPhersonWomen's Health, Waitematā District, Health New Zealand | Te Whatu Ora, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-3550-4746
Kate MoodabeTotal Healthcare, Auckland, New Zealand.
Richard MasseyPathology Associates New Zealand, Tauranga, New Zealand.ORCID 0009-0006-3835-5909
Sue CrengleNgāi Tahi Māori Health Research Unit, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-9367-1492
Susan M ShermanSchool of Psychology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England.ORCID 0000-0001-6708-3398
Nina ScottHauora Māori Services, Health New Zealand | Te Whatu Ora, Hamilton, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-9481-6400
Pania CooteMāori Monitoring Equity Group (National Screening Programmes), AwhiMai Consultancy, Bluff, New Zealand.
Wendy BurgessWomen's Health, Waitematā District, Health New Zealand | Te Whatu Ora, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0009-0009-5399-2502
Deralie FlowerObstetrics and Gynaecology, Te Toka Tumai Auckland District, Health New Zealand | Te Whatu Ora, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-8292-8974
Jyoti KathuriaWomen's Health, Counties Manukau District, Health New Zealand | Te Whatu Ora, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0009-0005-5406-7416

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHuman papillomavirus (HPV) self-testing was introduced in Aotearoa New Zealand in September 2023, with the potential to improve screening access and reduce inequities for priority populations: Māori, Pacific, and those overdue for screening by ≥ 2 years (underscreened). To contribute towards informing this change, we tested the implementation of offering the self-test opportunistically in primary care (with a take-home option) with follow-up by a central nursing team.

methodsTrained general practice clinicians offered HPV self-tests to eligible people aged 30–69 years who attended for any reason between November 2021 and September 2023. Six clinics were selected for high proportions of priority populations. The central team reminded participants to return samples (if tested at home), and notified and managed HPV results via telehealth.

resultsOf 9,292 potentially eligible people, 37.9% (n = 3,524) were self-tested. A lower rate of self-testing was seen in all priority populations: 34.7% in Māori and 36.3% in Pacific vs. 40.4% in European/Other (p < 0.01, p < 0.05, respectively), and 32.2% in underscreened vs. 52.3% in those < 6 months overdue (due) (p < 0.001). In the 16.8% of participants who took self-test kits home (n = 635), 61.1% (n = 388) returned a sample. Priority populations were more likely to take a test kit home: 22.2% of Māori and 20.0% of Pacific vs. 12.1% of European/Other, and 21.5% of underscreened vs. 11.7% of due (all p < 0.001). Although a similar return rate was seen in Māori (64.3%) vs. European/Other (70.3%), fewer Pacific (51.1% vs. 70.3% in European/Other; p < 0.05) and underscreened (48.7% vs. 89.4% in due; p < 0.001) returned their sample. HPV was detected in 9.5% of 3,524 returned results. Follow-up testing rates were high (96.4% for cytology; 92.8% for colposcopy).

conclusionsOpportunistically offering HPV self-tests in primary care engaged priority populations in cervical screening. Intensive support is required to achieve high rates of sample return (if tested at home) and follow-up where HPV was detected. Opportunistic offer of HPV self-testing in primary care should be considered as an important component of a broader strategy to increase equitable participation in cervical screening, with more focus needed for Māori, Pacific and those who are underscreened.

trial registrationThis study did not reach the ICJME or WHO criteria for clinical trial registration.

Indexed as

Human Papillomavirus VirusesMass ScreeningPapillomavirus InfectionsPrimary Health CareSelf-TestingAdultAgedEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHealth Plan ImplementationHumansMaleMaori PeopleMiddle AgedNew ZealandPacific Island PeopleAt-home testingCervical screeningHealth inequityHuman papillomavirus (HPV)Māori healthPacific healthPrimary careSelf-sampling

Identifiers

PMID41408509
PMCPMC12837625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.