ArticleNPJ digital medicine2025
Machine learning-based predictions of healthcare contacts following emergency hospitalisation using electronic health records.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Heterogeneous Graph Neural Network Framework for Multi-Horizon Stroke Mortality Prediction.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Using data and artificial intelligence to improve care pathways of older people experiencing falls and frailty: Opportunities, challenges and practical considerations for clinicians.Clinical medicine (London, England) · 2026Review
- Nurses as guardians of time: the hidden clinical value of continuous care in geriatrics.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Emergency care systems are challenged by the emergence of an ageing population, requiring tailored inputs facilitated by early care needs assessment. We examined the potential of Machine Learning algorithms to identify in-hospital healthcare contacts in older patients after emergency admission, developed from linked electronic health record (EHR) data within South-East Scotland. Gradient-boosting (XGBoost) prediction models were trained on frailty markers and nursing risk assessments to predict healthcare contacts, adverse outcomes and requirements for specialist input between arrival and 72 hours following admission. Across 98,242 patients, the predicted contact error rate varied between 49% at point of emergency attendance and 34% at 72 hours post-admission. Area-under-the-curve reached 0.89 in predicting need for urgent geriatric services, and 0.83 for in-hospital rehabilitation. Pressure ulcer risk and its documentation were predictive of received contacts. EHR data can predict granular estimates of in-hospital activity after ED attendance, facilitating quicker allocation to appropriate urgent care pathways.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.