Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41408443›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Stakeholder perceptions and planning implications for urban rewilding as a nature-based solution in Poland.

Giuseppe T Cirella, Jarosław Kempa, Andrzej Paczoski, Michael J Rościszewski-Dodgson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Giuseppe T CirellaFaculty of Economics, University of Gdansk, ul. Armii Krajowej 119/121, Sopot, 81-824, Poland. gt.cirella@ug.edu.pl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0810-0589
Jarosław KempaFaculty of Economics, University of Gdansk, ul. Armii Krajowej 119/121, Sopot, 81-824, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8311-0958
Andrzej PaczoskiFaculty of Economics, University of Gdansk, ul. Armii Krajowej 119/121, Sopot, 81-824, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9298-6687
Michael J Rościszewski-DodgsonFaculty of Economics, University of Gdansk, ul. Armii Krajowej 119/121, Sopot, 81-824, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9648-2240

Funding

International Visegrad Fund 22520146Polo Center of Sustainability PCS-V4+1-2025-1777
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urban rewilding is increasingly recognized as a nature-based solution for restoring biodiversity, mitigating climate risks, and strengthening urban resilience. Yet, empirical evidence on how rewilding is perceived and supported by both policymakers and the public-particularly in post-socialist contexts-remains scarce. This study investigates expert and community perspectives on urban rewilding in Poland through a mixed-method design: a nationwide survey of 32 municipal environmental officials and a visual preference survey with 1,000 residents of the coastal city of Sopot. Expert responses highlight strong conceptual support for rewilding's ecological and social benefits, but also identify persistent concerns about institutional feasibility, funding, and integration into existing planning frameworks. Community results reveal consistent public endorsement of moderate rewilding, with more cautious acceptance of intensive ecological designs in highly symbolic civic spaces. Taken together, the findings suggest that urban rewilding in Central and Eastern Europe is both socially viable and ecologically desirable, but its successful implementation will depend on adaptive governance, participatory planning, and the strategic use of visual engagement tools to bridge policy ambition with public expectations.

Indexed as

Circular land useCommunity perceptionsEnvironmental governancePublic spaceRewilding policySustainable urban planning

Identifiers

PMID41408443
PMCPMC12823571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.