ArticleScientific reports2025
Multicomponent intervention increases nutrition knowledge scores in rural China.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The knowledge-behavior gap in nutritional literacy and its associations with chronic disease in older adults: a mediation analysis.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Improving residents' nutrition knowledge (NK) is crucial for enhancing dietary health. However, rural areas in China face significant challenges in accessing effective nutrition education. This study aimed to design and evaluate the effectiveness and feasibility of a multicomponent nutrition education intervention strategy suitable for resource-limited rural areas. This study was conducted in five administrative villages in Chengdu, with a total population of approximately 20,000. Through focus group discussion, a multicomponent nutrition education intervention was designed and implemented over a four-week period. The intervention's effectiveness was assessed using two independent cross-sectional surveys (pre-intervention n = 275; post-intervention n = 280, adjusted to n = 275 for analysis to match the baseline). A validated questionnaire was used to evaluate changes in NK levels. The priority of strategies was ultimately determined based on coverage, feasibility, and cost. Six intervention channels were identified through focus group discussion. Post-intervention, the median NK score among villagers increased significantly from 60.0 to 70.0 (an increase of 10 points, p < 0.001). NK levels improved significantly across all demographic subgroups (p < 0.05), with subgroups having lower baseline NK levels (e.g., males, older adults, less-educated individuals, non-health/wellness workers and non-chronic disease patients) showing greater improvement, indicating a "catch-up effect" that reduces knowledge inequality. Based on effectiveness and feasibility assessments, the prioritized order of intervention strategies was: loudspeaker broadcasts > WeChat group videos > posters > leaflets > Child-Teaching-Family (CTF) program > prize quizzes. Multicomponent nutrition education interventions can effectively and equitably improve the NK of rural residents in China. The combination of "loudspeaker broadcasts + WeChat group videos" was confirmed as the core strategy, with its low-cost and wide-coverage characteristics being suitable for promotion in resource-limited areas. It is recommended to institutionalize such models by integrating them into primary public health services and clarifying the leading role of local governments in resource integration and sustainable promotion, thereby contributing to the goals of "Healthy China".
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.