ArticleJournal of cardiovascular electrophysiology2026
A Large, Real-World Cohort Analysis of Arrhythmia Detection and Therapeutic Interventions in Patients With Insertable Cardiac Monitors and Long-Term Monitoring.
Article in Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Large, Real-World Cohort Analysis of Arrhythmia Detection and Therapeutic Interventions in Patients With Insertable Cardiac Monitors and Long-Term Monitoring.Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundInsertable cardiac monitors (ICMs) provide long-term continuous monitoring for arrhythmia diagnosis and management for various clinical indications. However, little data exists on comprehensive real-world arrhythmia diagnostic yield and therapy rates in patients indicated for ICMs with validated artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms enabling large-scale, automated adjudication of ICM-detected episodes. We report the largest real-world analysis of arrhythmia detection as well as medical and procedural therapies in patients with ICMs implanted for guideline-approved indications with long-term monitoring.
methodsPatients who received a Reveal LINQ ICM between October 1, 2016, and June 30, 2020, with ≥ 1 year of follow-up were identified in two databases (Medtronic CareLink data warehouse, N = 12 020, and Optum Clinformatics Data Mart claims database, N = 17 037) to analyze arrhythmia detections and therapeutic interventions, respectively. Patients were categorized by clinical indication for ICM placement. All device-detected ECGs were identified and processed through arrhythmia-specific AI algorithms. Therapeutic interventions included procedural interventions (cardiovascular implantable electronic device implantation, cardioversions, and ablations) and medication initiation or titration (antiarrhythmics, rate-control medications, and oral anticoagulants) after ICM implant.
resultsMean (SD) follow-up in the CareLink and Clinformatics claims databases was 24.6 (12.7) and 40.8 (15.6) months, respectively. Of the 12 020 patients in the arrhythmia detection analysis, 7284 (60.6%) had ≥ 1 arrhythmia detected (56.3% in the suspected AF population; 80.1% in the AF management population), and 376 (28.9%) had ≥ 2 arrhythmias detected during long-term follow-up. Among syncope patients with arrhythmia(s) detected, 71.2% had a finding other than pause/bradycardia; 50.4% of cryptogenic stroke patients and 62.6% of AF management patients with arrhythmias had ≥ 1 finding other than AF. Of the 17 037 patients in the therapeutic interventions analysis, 9820 (57.6%) had a therapeutic action post-ICM insertion, with 25% of all patients receiving a procedural intervention, and > 50% undergoing a medication adjustment. Mean (SD) follow-up to first arrhythmia detection was 7 (9) months. Mean (SD) duration from ICM insertion to therapeutic action was 13 (13) months for procedures and 7 (11) months for medication initiation.
conclusionsLong-term continuous monitoring with ICMs enables identification of multiple arrhythmias that may have otherwise remained undetected and rules out arrhythmias in ~40% regardless of indication. Medication adjustments and/or procedural interventions related to the management of arrhythmias were observed in over half of ICM recipients during long-term follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.