Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41408322›Full record

ArticleTrials2025

Mifepristone versus placebo to increase the rate of spontaneous labour in people with a prior caesarean: a double-blind randomised controlled trial (Mi-labourTrial).

Meghan G Hill, Charlotte Oyston, Michelle R Wise, Robin Cronin, Moerangi Tamati, Gergely Toldi, Lynn Sadler

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Meghan G HillDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Reproductive Sciences, The University of Auckland, Level 1, Building 507, Grafton, Auckland, 1023, New Zealand. meghan.hill@auckland.ac.nz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4096-5339
Charlotte OystonDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Reproductive Sciences, The University of Auckland, Level 1, Building 507, Grafton, Auckland, 1023, New Zealand.
Michelle R WiseDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Reproductive Sciences, The University of Auckland, Level 1, Building 507, Grafton, Auckland, 1023, New Zealand.
Robin CroninDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Reproductive Sciences, The University of Auckland, Level 1, Building 507, Grafton, Auckland, 1023, New Zealand.
Moerangi TamatiWomen's Health, Te Whatu Ora Counties Manukau Health, 100 Hospital Road, Papatoetoe, Auckland, 2025, New Zealand.
Gergely ToldiLiggins Institute, University of Auckland, M&HS Building 503, 85 Park Road, Grafton, Auckland, 1023, New Zealand.
Lynn SadlerDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Reproductive Sciences, The University of Auckland, Level 1, Building 507, Grafton, Auckland, 1023, New Zealand.

Funding

Auckland Medical Research Foundation 1123013Maurice and Phyllis Paykel Trust 3732514
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFor people with a prior caesarean, avoiding a repeat caesarean and undergoing vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC) may decrease both short- and long-term complications. Current options include awaiting labour or undergoing induction of labour (IOL) with mechanical cervical dilation followed by amniotomy and oxytocin infusion. Spontaneous labour is preferred as the use of exogenous oxytocin increases the rate of uterine rupture, a feared complication of VBAC. Additional options are vital to improve the chance of labour in people with a prior caesarean scar. Mifepristone, a progesterone receptor antagonist, may have utility in people with a prior caesarean. The medication occupies progesterone receptors on the myometrium, thereby making the uterus more receptive to endogenous contractile agents.

methodsThe MiLabour trial is a double-blinded randomised controlled trial being carried out at two sites in New Zealand. People with a history of lower uterine segment caesarean birth are eligible. Participants are randomised in a 1:1 ratio to either a single dose of 200mg of mifepristone or to a single dose of placebo. The primary outcome of the MiLabour trial is onset of labour within 48 h of ingestion of study medication. To identify an increase in the rate of spontaneous labour within 48 h from 10 to 30% in the group receiving mifepristone, a minimum of 168 participants are required with a confidence interval of 95% and power at 90%. DISCUSSION: Safely preventing repeat caesarean births is a health priority. If mifepristone is an appropriate option, this would greatly impact pregnancy care. Research in this area has been hampered by the well-founded fear of uterine rupture, a surgical emergency with the potential for morbidity and mortality. If mifepristone achieves a higher rate of labour without the need for oxytocin, this could become a standard treatment approach for people with a lower uterine segment scar as they approach their due date.

trial registrationThe trial is registered on the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, anzctr.org.au. Full registry title is "Mifepristone versus placebo to increase the rate of spontaneous labour in people with a prior caesarean: A double blind randomised controlled trial (Mi-labourTrial)". TRIAL ID: ACTRN12624000103561. Date registered 06/02/2024.

Indexed as

Hormone AntagonistsLabor, ObstetricMifepristoneVaginal Birth after CesareanAdultDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicNew ZealandPregnancyRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeHormone AntagonistsMifepristoneInduction of labourLabourMifepristonePrior caesareanThird trimesterVaginal birth after caesarean

Identifiers

PMID41408322
PMCPMC12709710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.