ArticleInternational journal of health geographics2025
Spatial mismatch and hierarchical optimization of healthcare facilities: a multi-source geospatial analysis of accessibility and supply-demand dynamics.
Article in International journal of health geographics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comment on 'clinical significance of the systemic immune-inflammation index in relation to pathology, treatment, and outcomes in acute appendicitis: a retrospective study'.Annals of medicine · 2026Article
- Mobile signaling big data, healthcare-seeking flows, and multidimensional healthcare access in Shanghai: implications for healthcare supply-demand matching and medical security governance.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In rapidly urbanizing megacities, the allocation of healthcare resources has long faced the dual challenges of spatial inequity and insufficient hierarchical diagnosis and treatment systems. This study constructed a multi-scale spatial analysis framework in Nanjing, China, to systematically diagnose the supply-demand mismatch of healthcare resources. By integrating the community-level detailed units and 100-meter population raster data, we combined the Hierarchical Two-Step Floating Catchment Area (H2SFCA) method with empirically calibrated service radii and introduced the "per capita bed compliance rate" to address the contradictions between "statistical adequacy" and "functional efficiency" in high-density clusters. The study revealed three key findings: First, medical resources in Nanjing present a "core-periphery" mismatch structure, tertiary hospitals are over-concentrated in the urban core (HH cluster), while per capita bed availability falls below the threshold (0.8 beds per thousand people), posing a hidden risk of overload. Second, secondary hospitals demonstrate a double paradox (LH-type shortages in old city and HL-type excesses in the suburbs), while the primary facilities fail to serve 32.57% of high-demand communities, contrasting sharply with inefficient HL-type redundancies found in remote suburbs. Additionally, 5% of transitional areas show statistically insignificant supply-demand correlations due to the disconnect between population mobility and static data. Based on these insights, the study proposes a two-path optimization framework-"Targeted interventions by LISA cluster type + hierarchical coordination (via referral networks)"-which offers an actionable pathway toward precision-oriented resource allocation. This approach not only provides practical solutions for establishing a"15-minute medical circle" in Nanjing but also presents a methodological paradigm applicable to high-density cities worldwide seeking effective strategies for hierarchical diagnosis and treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.