Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41408263›Full record

ArticleBMC oral health2025

Unmasking oral health stigma: a qualitative scoping review.

J Doughty, J Booth, M Smith, K Saini, M Paisi, A Rodriguez, A Levine, C Bedos, V Muirhead, C Martins de Barros and 1 more

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

J DoughtySchool of Dentistry, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK. Janineyd@liverpool.ac.uk.
J BoothPeninsula Dental School, Faculty of Health, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.
M SmithBridgewater Community NHS Foundation Trust, Warrington, UK.
K SainiSchool of Dentistry, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
M PaisiPeninsula Dental School, Faculty of Health, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.
A RodriguezSchool of Dentistry, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
A LevineFaculty of Dental Medicine and Oral Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
C BedosFaculty of Dental Medicine and Oral Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
V MuirheadInstitute of Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
C Martins de BarrosPatient and Public Involvement Contributors, England, UK.
C FreebornPatient and Public Involvement Contributors, England, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHealth-related stigma can limit access to care, impair adherence to treatment, and negatively impact mental health and quality-of-life. Oral health stigma, defined as stigma arising from oral conditions that diverge from sociocultural norms, operates through labelling, stereotyping, othering, and exclusion. Oral health stigma can lead to shame, diminished self-confidence, and avoidance of dental care, creating a self-perpetuating cycle of poor oral health and reinforcing internalised and anticipated stigma. While previous research has explored the social implications of oral appearance, little is known about the broader concept of oral health stigma or strategies to mitigate it.

methodsThis scoping review adopted Levac et al.'s six-stage framework. The review utilised data from qualitative studies to explore lived experiences of oral health stigma and consider ways to mitigate it. Patient and public involvement (PPI) informed the development of the research question, search strategy, and interpretation of findings.

resultsSeventy-two qualitative studies were included, comprising 2,455 participants. Themes included stigma associated with physical appearance and attractiveness, judgement, labelling, and stereotyping. Consequences included low self-esteem, social exclusion, impacts to care seeking behaviours, and efforts to conceal oral appearance. Participants highlighted the transformative value of dental care and described coping strategies to build resilience. Other proposed solutions included fostering social connection and implementing trauma-informed, non-judgemental dental care.

conclusionOral health stigma has significant social and psychological consequences and impacts on care-seeking behaviours. Addressing it requires targeted interventions at multiple levels, including individual, community, professionals and wider system / policy.

Indexed as

Oral HealthSocial StigmaHumansQualitative ResearchSelf ConceptStereotypingdentistryoral healthshamestigma

Identifiers

PMID41408263
PMCPMC12922240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.