Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41408240›Full record

ArticleBMC oral health2025

Assessment of cone-beam computed tomography indications in pediatric patients: a retrospective radiographic analysis.

Ceylan Çağıl Ertuğrul, Burak Kerem Apaydin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ceylan Çağıl ErtuğrulFaculty of Dentistry, Department of Paediatric Dentistry, Assoc Prof Dr. Pamukkale University, Denizli, Türkiye. certugrul@pau.edu.tr.
Burak Kerem ApaydinFaculty of Dentistry, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Assoc Prof Dr. Pamukkale University, Denizli, Türkiye. bapaydın@pau.edu.tr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) provides high-quality, three-dimensional imaging of the maxillofacial region. However, its use in pediatric patients remains controversial due to radiation dose concerns and the sensitivity of immature anatomical structures to radiation damage. This study aims to determine the prevalence and indications of dental CBCT usage in children.

methodsAll CBCT images of pediatric patients under 15 years old, obtained from 2018 to 2025 at a university hospital, were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic data, indications for CBCT, imaging field of view (FOV), and average kVp and mA values were evaluated. Descriptive statistics and Chi-square tests were used for data analysis.

resultsA total of 266 CBCT images from children aged 5-14 years (mean age 11.06; 128 females, 138 males) were included. The prevalence of CBCT among all pediatric patients in this age group was found to be 2.1%. Of the CBCT scans, 175 were for the pathologies from maxilla, 88 from the mandible, and 3 involving both jaws. Imaging was most commonly performed in the anterior (incisor) region for both sexes, with a statistically significant higher rate in males (p<0.001). Surgical indications accounted for 81.6% of cases, while orthodontic indications comprised 18.4%. The most common reasons for CBCT imaging were impacted teeth (29.3%), pathological lesions (21.4%), supernumerary teeth (17.3%), and mesiodens (15.8%). The most frequently used FOV was 15x12 cm.

conclusionsThe prevalence of CBCT use in pediatric patients is low and is primarily preferred before surgical interventions for impacted teeth and cyst/tumor-like lesions.

Indexed as

Cone-Beam Computed TomographyAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMaleMaxillaRetrospective StudiesCBCTCone-beam computed tomographyPediatric CBCT indicationsPediatric CBCT prevalence

Identifiers

PMID41408240
PMCPMC12809931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.