Observational studyBMC pulmonary medicine2025
Screening for lung fibrosis using serum surfactant protein-D, KL-6, and a deep learning algorithm on chest radiographs: a prospective observational study.
Observational study in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEarly identification of lung fibrosis remains difficult. In Japan, the serum biomarkers surfactant protein-D (SP-D) and KL-6 are commonly used to monitor interstitial lung diseases (ILD) in clinical practice, but their potential role in the early detection of lung fibrosis has not yet been fully clarified. Although chest radiography is also considered a possible tool for identifying subclinical pulmonary fibrosis, detecting early-stage disease remains challenging. A deep learning-based software, BMAX, was recently developed to identify fibrosing ILD on chest radiographs. Its capability to detect lung fibrosis in a health-checkup setting requires validation.
methodsStudy participants were randomly recruited from individuals undergoing routine health examinations. All participants underwent chest radiography and serum SP-D and KL-6 testing. Those with elevated biomarker levels (≥ 110 ng/mL for SP-D and ≥ 500 IU/mL for KL-6) or radiographic abnormalities were advised to undergo further evaluation with chest computed tomography (CT). Lung fibrosis on CT was assessed independently by one pulmonologist and one thoracic radiologist. BMAX assigned a confidence score for lung fibrosis (ranging from 0 to 1) on each radiograph. In participants who underwent CT, the sensitivity and specificity of BMAX (using a confidence score > 0.3 as the threshold), SP-D, and KL-6 for detecting lung fibrosis were evaluated.
resultsAmong the 2,751 individuals enrolled, 228 were recommended for CT, and 81 underwent the scan. Lung fibrosis was identified on chest CT in 8 of the 81 participants. The positivity rates for SP-D, KL-6, and BMAX (confidence score > 0.3) were 5.9%, 2.4%, and 5.9%, respectively. SP-D showed a sensitivity of 1.000 and a specificity of 0.315, while KL-6 showed a sensitivity of 0.750 and a specificity of 0.753. BMAX demonstrated a sensitivity of 1.000 and a specificity of 0.904.
conclusionsSP-D and KL-6 may be useful screening biomarkers for lung fibrosis in health checkup settings, offering high sensitivity and moderate positivity rates. BMAX also appears promising as a standalone screening tool for detecting lung fibrosis on chest radiographs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.