Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41408216›Full record

Trial reportBMC medical education2025

Effect of using artificial intelligence chatbot about electronic fetal monitoring on maternity nursing students' performance.

Amal Mohamed Talaat Abdelwahab, Marwa Ibrahim Hamdy Aboraiah, Hanan Elsayed Mohamed Elsayed

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07051343 (Effect of Using Artificial Intelligence Chatbot About Electronic Fetal Monitoring on Maternity Nursing Students' Performance), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07051343 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

Effect of Using Artificial Intelligence Chatbot About Electronic Fetal Monitoring on Maternity Nursing Students' Performance

TypeinterventionalSponsorMansoura UniversityRan2025 to 2025Enrolled84ConditionsArtificial Intelligence (AI), Electronic Fetal Monitoring, Nursing StudentsArmsdesigned artificial intelligence Chatbot education about electronic fetal monitoring, traditional teaching method
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Amal Mohamed Talaat AbdelwahabDepartment of Woman's Health and Midwifery Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Mansoura University, Mansoura , Egypt. AMAL_2018@mans.edu.eg.
Marwa Ibrahim Hamdy AboraiahDepartment of Woman's Health and Midwifery Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Mansoura University, Mansoura , Egypt.
Hanan Elsayed Mohamed ElsayedDepartment of Woman's Health and Midwifery Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Mansoura University, Mansoura , Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe integration of artificial intelligence chatbots in education has led to numerous possibilities, providing a focused, personalized, and result-oriented learning environment that enhances students’ cognitive and interpretive skills. Electronic fetal monitoring-related tasks require professional knowledge and clinical insight; with the aim of supporting students in making accurate decisions when dealing with real cases, it is necessary to engage them in authentic problem-solving contexts. AIM OF THE STUDY: This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of an electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) chatbot in improving maternity nursing students’ theoretical knowledge, practical interpretation skills, confidence in clinical reasoning, academic motivation, and satisfaction with feedback.

methodsA quasi-experimental design was conducted among 84 undergraduate nursing students at the Faculty of Nursing, Mansoura University, Egypt, allocated into an intervention group (n = 42), received artificial intelligence chatbot–based education, and a control group (n = 42), received traditional teaching method. Data were collected using: (1) a self-administered questionnaire to assess students’ knowledge, interpretation skills, and clinical reasoning confidence regarding electronic fetal monitoring; (2) the Academic Motivation Scale; and (3) a students’ satisfaction survey. Data were analyzed with SPSS v22.0. Normality and homogeneity of variance were assessed with the Shapiro–Wilk and Levene’s tests, respectively. Continuous variables were reported as means and standard deviations, and categorical variables as numbers and percentages. Chi-square, Fisher’s exact, and paired t-tests were employed for group comparisons as appropriate. Effect sizes were estimated using Cohen’s d and Eta squared (η²). Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

resultsCompared with the control group, the current research revealed statistically significant improvements in students’ knowledge, practical interpretation, and critical reasoning regarding fetal monitoring, as well as academic motivation among students who received chatbot education at the post and follow-up tests (p < 0.001). In addition, 90.5% of the participants in the intervention group reported high levels of satisfaction with the chatbot.

conclusionChatbot education significantly improved students’ theoretical knowledge, practical interpretation skills, confidence in clinical reasoning, and academic motivation, with sustained gains observed at both the post and follow-up tests. Additionally, students reported high satisfaction with the feedback provided by the chatbot.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT07051343, registered on June 6, 2025.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceClinical CompetenceFetal MonitoringObstetric NursingStudents, NursingAdultEgyptFemaleHumansPregnancyYoung AdultArtificial intelligenceChatbotEducationElectronic fetal monitoring

Identifiers

PMID41408216
PMCPMC12825235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.