ArticleBMC medical imaging2025
Progressive curriculum learning with Scale-Enhanced U-Net for continuous airway segmentation.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- TI-YOLO: A Lightweight and Efficient Anatomical Structure Detection Model for Tracheal Intubation.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Continuous and accurate segmentation of airways in chest CT images is essential for preoperative planning and real-time bronchoscopy navigation. Despite advances in deep learning for medical image segmentation, maintaining airway continuity remains a challenge, particularly due to intra-class imbalance between large and small branches and blurred CT details. To address these challenges, we propose a progressive curriculum learning pipeline and a Scale-Enhanced U-Net (SE-UNet) to improve detail extraction, thereby enhancing segmentation continuity. Compared with previous connectivity-aware methods, our framework directly tackles the imbalance between large and small branches through end-to-end progressive learning, while balancing airway tree completeness and accuracy. Specifically, our curriculum learning pipeline comprises three stages. Stage 1 performs coarse learning to extract main airways. Stage 2 introduces a General Union Loss (GUL) to improve the identification of smaller airways. In Stage 3, we propose an Adaptive Topology-Responsive Loss (ATRL), which encourages the network to focus on preserving airway continuity. Throughout all stages, a crop sampling strategy is employed to reduce feature interference between airways of varying scales, effectively addressing the intra-class imbalance. The progressive training pipeline shares the same SE-UNet, integrating multi-scale inputs and Detail Information Enhancers (DIEs) to enhance information flow and effectively capture the intricate details of small airways. Additionally, we propose a robust airway tree parsing method and hierarchical evaluation metrics to provide more clinically relevant and precise analysis. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our method outperforms existing approaches on the ATM'22 challenge dataset and achieves a 9.631% improvement in the Tree length Detection rate (TD) of small airways and a 4.622% improvement in the Branch Detection rate (BD) of the overall airway tree on our in-house dataset, thereby significantly enhancing small-airway accuracy and overall airway tree completeness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.