Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41408172›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2025

Polypharmacy and healthcare expenditures among older adults in the United States: a propensity score-matched study.

Shaoxi Pan, Shanshan Li, Yin Shi, Qi Kang, Shaoxiang Jiang, Gordon G Liu, Hongyan Wu, Beini Lyu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Shaoxi PanDepartment of Health Economics and Medical Insurance, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Shanshan LiInstitute for Global Health and Development, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Yin ShiChina Center for Health Economic Research, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Qi KangDepartment of Geriatrics, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Shaoxiang JiangInstitute for Global Health and Development, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Gordon G LiuInstitute for Global Health and Development, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Hongyan WuSchool of Public Health, the Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution Monitoring and Disease Control, Ministry of Education, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, Guizhou, China. hongyanwu@gmc.edu.cn.
Beini LyuInstitute for Global Health and Development, Peking University, Beijing, China. blyu@pku.edu.cn.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 72404006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPolypharmacy is associated with increased risk of adverse events and may increase healthcare expenditures. However, there is a lack of study using nationally representative data to assess additional healthcare costs associated with polypharmacy. This study aimed to quantify the associations between polypharmacy and healthcare expenditures and affordability of healthcare among older adults.

methodsWe used data from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) from 2018 to 2021, which provides nationally presentative data in the US. Polypharmacy was defined as using ≥ 5 medications in the survey year. We included 23,300 adult participants aged 65 years or older (13,339 with and 9,961 without polypharmacy). Propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to control for sociodemographic and an extensive list of comorbidities. We used a two-part model to examine associations between polypharmacy and healthcare expenditures and logistic regression to examine associations between polypharmacy and affordability of care. Unaffordability of care was defined as not or delay receiving healthcare because patients could not afford it in the past 12 months.

resultsAfter PSM, 4,925 participants with polypharmacy and 4,925 without polypharmacy were included. The mean (95% confidence interval, CI) age of study population was 73.9 (95% CI: 73.8-74.2) years, with 54.5% (95% CI: 54.0-55.0) being female. All characteristics were well-balanced (standardized mean differences < 0.1 for all). Following PSM, the average annual total expenditure was $14,691.06 for older adults with polypharmacy and $8,912.09 for those without. Polypharmacy was associated with $4,303.82 (95% CI: 3,948.56-4,659.08) higher annual total healthcare expenditures, including $1,178.67 (95% CI: 1,165.10-1,192.38) more for prescription medicines, $1,359.83 (95% CI: 885.14-1,884.52) more for office-based visits, $814.91 (95% CI: 176.77-1,192. 06) more for inpatient stays, and $886.16 (95% CI: 322.48-1,449.83) more for outpatient visits. Furthermore, polypharmacy was associated with significantly higher risk of unaffordability of prescription medications (adjusted odds ratio [95% CI] 1.70 [1.30-2.23]).

conclusionsUsing propensity score methods, we provided estimates of additional healthcare costs associated with polypharmacy. Our research highlights the potential economic burden of polypharmacy on patients, family, insurers, and society.

Indexed as

Health ExpendituresPolypharmacyPropensity ScoreAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleUnited StatesCostsHealthcare expendituresOlder adultsPolypharmacy

Identifiers

PMID41408172
PMCPMC12821876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.