ArticleBMC bioinformatics2025
CIA: unveiling cellular identities with cluster-independent annotation in single-cell RNA sequencing data for comprehensive cell type characterization and exploration.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSingle-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) has revolutionized our understanding of the transcriptional landscape of complex tissues, enabling the discovery of novel cell types and biological functions. However, the identification and classification of cells from scRNA-seq datasets remain significant challenges.
resultsTo address this, we developed a new computational tool called CIA (Cluster Independent Annotation), which accurately identifies cell types across different datasets without requiring a fully annotated reference dataset or complex machine learning processes. Based on predefined cell type signatures, CIA provides a highly user-friendly and practical solution to cell-type and functional annotation of single cells. The CIA framework is implemented in both the Python and R programming languages, making it applicable to all main single-cell analysis frameworks, and it is available under the MIT license with its documentation at the following links: Python package: https://pypi.org/project/cia-python/ . Python tutorial: https://cia-python.readthedocs.io/en/latest/tutorial/Cluster_Independent_Annotation.html . R package and tutorial: https://github.com/ingmbioinfo/CIA_R .
conclusionsOur results demonstrate that CIA classification performances are comparable to the other state-of-the-art approaches, while requiring a significantly lower computational running time. Overall, CIA simplifies the process of obtaining reproducible signature-based cell assignments that can be easily interpreted through graphical summaries providing researchers with a powerful tool to explore the complex transcriptional landscape of single cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.