ArticleScientific reports2025
An intuitionistic fuzzy automated negotiation model for personalized and efficient shared decision-making.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Participatory-informed preference optimization (PiPrO): A reinforcement learning simulation study.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Shared decision-making (SDM) is a healthcare decision-making model that integrates patient preferences with medical expertise. It seeks to foster active involvement, enhance satisfaction, and strengthen the doctor-patient relationship. However, SDM applications face three main challenges: the complexity of medical information, the ambiguity of patient preferences, and the uncertainty of treatment outcomes. These challenges lead to a negotiation process that is frequently time-consuming and complex. Although existing SDM tools have made progress in improving efficiency, they still face challenges in addressing all of these issues simultaneously. In response to these challenges, this paper introduces an Agent-based Auto-negotiation Model based on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets (AN-IFF). Specifically, AN-IFF tackles the uncertainties inherent in preference assessment and negotiation decision-making using intuitionistic fuzzy sets and fuzzy inference systems. The model also includes a time-discounting mechanism to dynamically adjust the concession strategy, generating an optimal counter-offer set. To further accommodate varying decision-making behaviors, AN-IFF introduces three distinct negotiation strategies that simulate the concessionary behaviors of decision-makers with optimistic, balanced, and pessimistic personalities. The model rationalizes the consultation process by fuzzy modeling physician and patient preferences while integrating multiple personality traits. Experimental results based on negotiation preference data show that AN-IFF effectively models the differences in concession behavior among decision-makers with diverse personalities in SDM contexts. Furthermore, AN-IFF demonstrates significant improvements in joint satisfaction, fairness, and the number of negotiation rounds compared to baseline methods, such as FCAN.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.