ArticleScientific reports2025
Optimization and physicochemical & antioxidant properties of leek (Allium porrum L.) dried by foam-mat drying.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The foam drying method has evolved as a novel food drying technique. In the present study, the foam-mat drying technique is used to produce powder from leek (Allium porrum L.). The proportions of foaming agents were systematically optimized using the response surface methodology (RSM) and central composite design model. The optimized formulation was identified as 1.50% carboxymethyl cellulose, 14.37% maltodextrin, and 8.93% egg white. The optimal composition was adjusted for achieving high foam stability, high volume, and low density. This improved formula was then freeze-dried and dried using hot air at 50 °C and 70 °C, and its physical and chemical properties, antioxidant abilities, and overall quality were analyzed afterward. Based on the data obtained, the Midilli model was identified as the most suitable drying model. The TPC values for the samples dried at 50 °C, 70 °C, and freeze-dried were 1340.31, 1368.87, and 1349.83 mg/kg, while the TFC values were 208.78, 225.61, and 225.61 mg/kg. The antioxidant activities measured using the ABTS, DPPH, and FRAP tests were 8.58, 16.18, and 13.83 mmol/g for ABTS; 3.43, 4.56, and 1.91 mmol/g for DPPH; and 1.04, 1.32, and 1.27 mmol/g for FRAP, respectively. Considering the types of volatile compounds and the qualities of the powder, the samples dried at 50 °C using the convective method showed the best outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.