Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41408099›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Complexity analyses of geomagnetic and solar activity indices time series.

Mohsen Javaherian, Saeid Mollaei, Neda Zolghadr, Hooman Moradpour, Mehdi Yousefzadeh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mohsen JavaherianResearch Institute for Astronomy and Astrophysics of Maragha (RIAAM), University of Maragheh, 55136-553, Maragheh, Iran. javaherian@maragheh.ac.ir.
Saeid MollaeiDepartment of Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Zanjan, 45196-313, Zanjan, Iran.
Neda ZolghadrDepartment of Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Zanjan, 45196-313, Zanjan, Iran.
Hooman MoradpourResearch Institute for Astronomy and Astrophysics of Maragha (RIAAM), University of Maragheh, 55136-553, Maragheh, Iran.
Mehdi YousefzadehInstitute of Frontier and Interdisciplinary Science, Shandong University, Qingdao, 266237, Shandong, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The universal properties of the geomagnetic/solar indices critically describe their time series' dynamics. Here, we investigate the complexity behavior of the time series of the geomagnetic and solar activity indices Kp, DST, Ap, F10.7, [Formula: see text], AE, AL, AU, pc, and R. To do this, we apply multiscale entropy (MSE) analysis, detrended fluctuation analysis (DFA), rescaled range (R/S) test, and visibility graph (VG) to the time series of indices recorded daily from January 1st, 1996 to January 1st, 2020. MSE analysis reveals that AE exhibits the lowest entropy (minimal complexity), followed by F10.7, [Formula: see text], and R. Ap shows intermediate complexity, while AL, Dst, AU, and pc maintain higher entropy values. The range of Hurst exponents between 0.5 and 1 extracted from DFA and R/S analyses confirms the long-term memory of geomagnetic indices. In contrast, solar activity indices exhibit Hurst exponents consistent with pink noise or non-stationarity. VG analysis identifies AU, Dst, pc, and Kp as possessing "small-world" characteristics-corroborating strong long-range correlations. Synthesized results indicate that the indices Kp, Dst, AL, AU, and pc exhibit stronger evidence of long-term correlated memory, while the solar indices, along with the geomagnetic index AE, are comparatively suitable for studying transient phenomena.

Identifiers

PMID41408099
PMCPMC12711905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.