Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41408094›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Efficient and scalable training set generation for automated pollen monitoring with Hirst-type samplers.

András Biricz, Donát Magyar, Björn Gedda, Antonio Spanu, János Fillinger, Adrián Pesti, István Csabai, Péter Pollner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

András BiriczDepartment of Physics of Complex Systems, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary. andras.biricz@ttk.elte.hu.
Donát MagyarNational Center for Public Health and Pharmacy, Budapest, Hungary.
Björn GeddaThe Palynological Laboratory at the Swedish Museum of Natural History, Stockholm, Sweden.
Antonio SpanuINRAE, UR 546 BioSP, Site Agroparc, Avignon, France.
János FillingerNational Korányi Institute for Pulmonology, Budapest, Hungary.
Adrián PestiDepartment of Pathology, Forensic and Insurance Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
István CsabaiDepartment of Physics of Complex Systems, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary.
Péter PollnerData-Driven Health Division, National Laboratory for Health Security, Health Services Management Training Centre, Budapest, Hungary. pollner@emk.semmelweis.hu.

Funding

National Research, Development, and Innovation Office of Hungary 2020-1.1.2-PIACI-KFI-2021-00298National Research, Development, and Innovation Office of Hungary RRF-2.3.1-21-2022-00004National Research, Development, and Innovation Office of Hungary RRF-2.3.1-21-2022-00006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Automated pollen detection is essential for ecological monitoring, allergy forecasting, and biodiversity research. However, existing methods rely heavily on manual or semi-automated annotations, limiting scalability and broader applicability. We introduce a highly automated training dataset generation pipeline that combines one-shot detection with systematic refinement, producing tens of thousands of high-quality annotations from bright-field microscopy while significantly reducing manual effort and annotation costs. Using multi-regional datasets from France, Hungary, and Sweden, we trained object detection models on seven pollen taxa and evaluated their performance on both external pure and mixed species slides and real-world airborne samples. We assessed the reusability of pretrained vision models for pollen detection, aiming to reduce the need for extensive retraining. Using linear probing, we identified foundational Vision Transformers (ViTs) as the most effective feature extractors and integrated them into Faster R-CNN detection models. We benchmarked these models against ResNet50, a widely adopted backbone in biological imaging. On held-out regions of the training datasets, our models achieved high performance in both classification and detection tasks. On independent reference slides from other datasets, ViTs continued to outperform ResNet50 in classification. However, in full object detection and under real deployment conditions, ResNet50-based models remained competitive and achieved the highest accuracy for detecting Ambrosia, a major allergen with public health significance. Cross-dataset generalization remains a challenge, underscoring the need for domain adaptation techniques such as stain normalization and data augmentation. This study establishes a scalable framework for AI-assisted pollen monitoring, supporting large-scale slide digitization and enabling applications in long-term ecological research, allergen surveillance, and automated biodiversity assessment.

Indexed as

AllergensEnvironmental MonitoringImage Processing, Computer-AssistedPollenHumansAllergensAirborne allergen analysisAutomated pollen detectionDeep learningHirst-type samplerOpen-vocabulary object detectionPollen monitoringVision Transformer

Identifiers

PMID41408094
PMCPMC12808117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.