ArticleScientific reports2025
Efficient and scalable training set generation for automated pollen monitoring with Hirst-type samplers.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Automated pollen detection is essential for ecological monitoring, allergy forecasting, and biodiversity research. However, existing methods rely heavily on manual or semi-automated annotations, limiting scalability and broader applicability. We introduce a highly automated training dataset generation pipeline that combines one-shot detection with systematic refinement, producing tens of thousands of high-quality annotations from bright-field microscopy while significantly reducing manual effort and annotation costs. Using multi-regional datasets from France, Hungary, and Sweden, we trained object detection models on seven pollen taxa and evaluated their performance on both external pure and mixed species slides and real-world airborne samples. We assessed the reusability of pretrained vision models for pollen detection, aiming to reduce the need for extensive retraining. Using linear probing, we identified foundational Vision Transformers (ViTs) as the most effective feature extractors and integrated them into Faster R-CNN detection models. We benchmarked these models against ResNet50, a widely adopted backbone in biological imaging. On held-out regions of the training datasets, our models achieved high performance in both classification and detection tasks. On independent reference slides from other datasets, ViTs continued to outperform ResNet50 in classification. However, in full object detection and under real deployment conditions, ResNet50-based models remained competitive and achieved the highest accuracy for detecting Ambrosia, a major allergen with public health significance. Cross-dataset generalization remains a challenge, underscoring the need for domain adaptation techniques such as stain normalization and data augmentation. This study establishes a scalable framework for AI-assisted pollen monitoring, supporting large-scale slide digitization and enabling applications in long-term ecological research, allergen surveillance, and automated biodiversity assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.