ArticleScientific reports2025
Enhanced sensing performance through the integration of denoising autoencoder and ensembling techniques.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In cognitive radio networks (CRNs), collaborative spectrum sensing has emerged as a promising technique for detecting primary user activity. However, the effectiveness of user cooperation is compromised by the presence of malicious users, specifically False Sensing Users (FSUs). FSUs undermine the effectiveness of collaborative sensing by providing misleading information to the fusion center (FC) in an attempt to selfishly access spectrum resources. Therefore, this study focuses on three types of FSUs that exhibit distinct attack patterns: No False Sensing (NFS, i.e., Always-No), Yes False Sensing (YFS), and Yes/No false sensing (YNFS) users. The FC collects reports from both FSUs and legitimate sensing users at varying time intervals. This study employs a denoising autoencoder (DAE) to enhance sensing reliability by mitigating the effects of abnormal sensing reports and noise disturbances at the FC. While current validation employs synthetic data that closely approximates theoretical CRN conditions, real-world RF validation represents an important direction for future work. The autoencoder produces cleaned soft energy data, which is fed into a machine learning (ML) classifier to estimate channel availability and accumulate global decisions. The present study assesses the effectiveness of various classification techniques, including decision trees (DT), k nearest neighbor (KNN), neural networks (NN), ensemble classification (EC), Gaussian naive Bayes (GNB), and random forest classifier (RFC), to classify channel states. Additionally, this paper aims to provide a comprehensive evaluation of these methods. The integration of DAE and EC yields high accuracy, F1 score, and Matthew's Correlation Coefficient (MCC), leading to a reliable global decision at the FC with minimal sensing error.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.