Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41408087›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery2026

Initial Post-Commercialization Experience Using a Thoracic Branch Endoprosthesis: Broad Application to Real-World Patients.

Xiaoying Lou, Patrick R Vargo, Francis Caputo, Sean Lyden, Benjamin Kramer, Marijan Koprivanac, Vidyasagar Kalahasti, Milind Desai, Eric E Roselli, Aorta Center Investigators

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The Management of Left Subclavian Artery in Aortic Open and Endovascular Surgery.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Xiaoying LouAorta Center, Heart, Vascular, and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4847-5649
Patrick R VargoAorta Center, Heart, Vascular, and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, United States.
Francis CaputoAorta Center, Heart, Vascular, and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, United States.
Sean LydenAorta Center, Heart, Vascular, and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, United States.
Benjamin KramerAorta Center, Heart, Vascular, and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, United States.
Marijan KoprivanacAorta Center, Heart, Vascular, and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, United States.
Vidyasagar KalahastiAorta Center, Heart, Vascular, and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, United States.
Milind DesaiAorta Center, Heart, Vascular, and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0010-9797
Eric E RoselliAorta Center, Heart, Vascular, and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1533-7987
Aorta Center Investigators

Funding

High-Risk Cardiovascular Research Philanthropic Fund
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe first thoracic branched endoprosthesis (TBE) device for arch and proximal descending aortic thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) became commercially available in the United States in 2022 (WL Gore, Flagstaff, AZ, United States). The pivotal approval study was limited to zone 2 deployment in cases of aortic aneurysm, but its use in aortic dissections and deployment in zones 0 and 1 remain investigational. We describe early results of Gore TBE device deployment in real-world patients and in a variety of clinical settings including off-label indications.

methodsPatient characteristics, procedural details, and postoperative outcomes were assessed in this retrospective single-centre cohort study. Twenty-one patients (38.2%) were not open surgical candidates due to comorbidities. Follow-up evaluations included computed tomography angiography imaging of the device and its branches in addition to out. PATIENT: evaluation at discharge, 3 and 12 months, and then annually thereafter. The rate of endoleaks and re-interventions were assessed over the course of follow-up.

resultsBetween September 2022 and September 2024, 55 consecutive patients underwent aortic repair using the Gore TBE endoprosthesis at our institution. Ten (18.2%) cases were performed in an urgent/emergency setting. Indication for TBE repair was arch, descending and/or thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysm (N = 26 [47.3%]), dissection (N = 27 [49.1%], 6 acute/subacute), intramural haematoma (N = 1 [1.8%]), or aortic coarctation (N = 1 [1.8%)]. Device deployment was performed in aortic zone 0 (N = 16 [29.1%]), zone 1 (N = 5 [9.1%]), or zone 2 (N = 34 [61.8%]). Twenty-four (43.6%) underwent an aortic arch debranching procedure prior to TEVAR, and 23 (41.8%) had preoperative spinal drain placement. Technical success was 100.0% following the index operation. Operative mortality was 3.6% (N = 2). There were no cases of stroke or paralysis and one case of renal failure requiring dialysis. One patient experienced paraparesis treated with spinal drain placement with immediate resolution. Median follow-up was 366 (interquartile range [IQR]: 189, 444) days. The rate of endoleak over the follow-up period was 16.4% (N = 9). Three cases were treated medically with ongoing surveillance, and the remaining 6 underwent intervention: 5 endovascular, 1 open. The linearized all-cause mortality rate was 11.0% per patient-year.

conclusionsReal-world use of the Gore TBE device demonstrates its safety and versatility in addressing various aortic pathologies and deployment zones. Further follow-up is necessary to assess the durability of repair, and novel investigational devices may improve outcomes.

Indexed as

Aorta, ThoracicAortic Aneurysm, ThoracicBlood Vessel ProsthesisBlood Vessel Prosthesis ImplantationEndovascular ProceduresAgedAged, 80 and overAortic DissectionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsProsthesis DesignRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcomeaortic arch aneurysmaortic arch dissectionbranched endoprosthesisthoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR)

Identifiers

PMID41408087
PMCPMC12798527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.