ArticleScientific reports2025
Mixture of checkpoint experts for explainable seizure detection using wearable devices.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The current gold standard for detecting epileptic seizures is in-hospital video-Electroencephalography (vEEG), but vEEG is resource-intensive and imposes considerable burdens on patients and caregivers. Wearable devices offer an alternative to monitor seizures over long periods in a home environment and Machine Learning (ML) models can be used to analyze the data and identify seizure activity. The best performing ML models tend to be black-box models which do not provide a rationale for their decision, making it difficult to audit their mistakes and limit their real-world utility. To combat this, we propose a novel ML algorithm, Mixture of Checkpoint Experts (MoCE). MoCE provides direct insights into the behavior of a model at both the global (overall performance) and local (individual predictions) level that are not available with classic black-box models. Through a study conducted in 14 patients with epilepsy using wrist-worn devices, we demonstrate how this transparency is beneficial to both clinicians and data scientists, who can audit individual predictions for the reason of a decision, providing greater information about the model and its behaviors. Our experiments reveal that MoCE is capable of detecting seizures better than existing neural networks by retaining equivalent performance in recall with statistically significant improvement in false alarm rate while simultaneously addressing the issues of black-box models that many clinicians face.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.