Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41408068›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Quality and accuracy of scoliosis-related short videos on TikTok reviewed in China in August 2025.

Qinxin Zhou, Jianzeng Shen, Dongdong Cao, Weijie Yu, Jixin Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Qinxin Zhou *Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shaoxing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine Affiliated to Zhejiang, Chinese Medical University, Shaoxing, 312000, China.
Jianzeng Shen *Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shaoxing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine Affiliated to Zhejiang, Chinese Medical University, Shaoxing, 312000, China.
Dongdong CaoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, 300381, China.
Weijie YuDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, YunNan Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Kunming, 650021, China.
Jixin ChenDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shaoxing Shangyu District Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No. 66 Dayuan Road, Lianghu Street, Shangyu District, Shaoxing, 312300, China. cjx_tcm@163.com.

Funding

Medical and Health Science and Technology Plan of Zhejiang Province NO. 2025KY384Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province NO. LQN25H270006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Scoliosis is a common spinal disorder that affects 2-4% of adolescents worldwide. With the rise of short-video platforms like TikTok, they have increasingly played a significant role in health information dissemination. However, the quality and accuracy of scoliosis-related video content on these platforms have not been thoroughly studied. The objective of this study was to assess the accuracy and quality of scoliosis-related videos on TikTok. Using a cross-sectional design and a newly created TikTok account with cleared cache to minimize bias, we retrieved the platform's top 100 scoliosis-related short videos via its default sorting algorithm on August 17, 2025. Two independent reviewers with backgrounds in orthopedic surgery and health-information assessment extracted basic data and evaluated each video's quality and accuracy with the Global Quality Score (GQS, 1-5), modified DISCERN (0-5), and JAMA (0-4). Bivariate associations used Spearman's rank correlation; multivariable associations used a proportional-odds ordinal logistic model with GQS as the outcome. A total of 95 videos were included in the analysis. 5 videos were excluded due to language mismatch, redundancy, or commercial content. Video duration was median 60 s (IQR 45-87). The median number of views was 8109 (IQR 2112-33,856). Professional individuals accounted for 63.8% of the uploaded videos, while non-professional individuals contributed 33.0%. The median GQS for professional videos was 3, while for non-professional videos it was 2. The video content primarily focused on treatment (68.1%), with less emphasis on diagnosis (16%) and prevention (8.5%). The videos exhibited moderate overall quality, with median scores of 3 for GQS and mDISCERN, and 2 for JAMA, with IQRs of 2-4, 2-3, and 1-2, respectively. Videos uploaded by professional individuals had higher quality and accuracy scores. Fans correlated with mDISCERN and JAMA scores (r = 0.241, P = 0.017 and r = 0.275, P = 0.005, respectively). In the multivariable model, collections (OR = 4.287, 95% CI 1.313-13.989) and duration (OR = 2.664, 95% CI 1.370-5.182) were associated with higher GQS, whereas patient as the uploader identity (OR = 0.064, 95% CI 0.007-0.621) and prognosis content (OR = 0.052, 95% CI 0.005-0.555) were associated with lower GQS. The quality and accuracy of scoliosis-related short videos on TikTok are generally low, with lower quality and accuracy scores for non-professionals.. The main problems are lack of professional review, misleading information, and emphasis on treatment rather than prevention. It is recommended that the public exercise caution when browsing health information on short-video platforms, and that medical professionals provide higher-quality educational content. This study provides a basis for the regulation and optimization of health information on short-video platforms.

Indexed as

Information DisseminationScoliosisVideo RecordingAdolescentChinaCross-Sectional StudiesHumansAccuracyQualityScoliosisShort videosTikTok

Identifiers

PMID41408068
PMCPMC12711883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.