Trial reportGeroScience2026
Beyond strength: dietary nitrate augments self-selected functional mobility after resistance training in middle-aged adults.
Trial report in GeroScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to assess whether dietary nitrate supplementation with resistance training (RT) augments gait performance and functional mobility in inactive middle-aged and older adults. We hypothesized that combining nitrate-rich beetroot juice (BRJ) with RT would yield improvements in gait and functional mobility compared to RT with nitrate-depleted beetroot juice placebo (PLA) supplementation. In this 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot trial, 28 healthy, inactive adults (56 ± 7 years) were assigned to either a BRJ (~ 12.8 mmol nitrate/day) or PLA group while completing a supervised, full-body RT program (2×/week). Pre- and post-intervention assessments included the instrumented stand and walk (iSAW), 6-min walk test (i6MWT), and timed up and go (iTUG) tests. Supplement adherence, training compliance, and volume were equivalent between groups. ANCOVA analyses controlling baseline values revealed significant between-group differences favoring the BRJ group for gait speed (adjusted means: 1.38 vs 1.27 m/s, p = .010), stride length (p < .001), and iTUG duration (p < .05). Within-group analyses confirmed that the BRJ group experienced significant improvements in gait speed (p < 0.001) and iTUG duration (p < 0.05), while the PLA group showed no functional changes, indicating that 12 weeks of RT alone was insufficient to improve functional mobility in our sample despite equivalent training responses (p > .05). In our middle-aged sample, supplementing dietary nitrate alongside RT led to clinically meaningful improvements in functional mobility during self-selected conditions, exceeding the gains from 12 weeks of twice-weekly RT alone. Preliminary descriptive analyses revealed sex-specific group-level differences that might suggest emerging trends. Although no inferential statistics were conducted, the patterns provide potential directions for future research investigating the effects of RT in middle-aged adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.