ArticleAAPS PharmSciTech2025
Mechanistic Modelling of Lidocaine and Prilocaine Absorption from EMLA Cream upon Topical Application using Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modelling.
Article in AAPS PharmSciTech, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modelling can be utilized in dermal drug development and to support regulatory assessments by integrating information related to the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API), drug product, and skin physiology into a mechanistic simulation framework. The purpose of this study was to develop a mechanistic skin absorption model to predict the absorption of lidocaine and prilocaine following topical application of EMLA cream (lidocaine/prilocaine topical cream, 2.5%/2.5%) in virtual subjects. The multi-phase multi-layer mechanistic dermal absorption (MPML MechDermA™) model was used to simulate in vitro permeation of both APIs. Changes in formulation pH post application were studied experimentally, and these dynamic changes were captured in the model when simulating finite dose studies using ex vivo human skin. A dermal in vivo PBPK model for the EMLA cream (lidocaine/prilocaine topical cream, 2.5%/2.5%) was developed and validated. The model was able to consider the formulation and trial design differences of in vivo studies and adequately simulated the observed data. Further model validation was performed against a manufactured cream with microstructural characteristics that were different compared to the EMLA cream. Through virtual bioequivalence assessments, the in vivo model demonstrated that it may be used to predict the impact of differences in drug product quality attributes on the in vivo performance of a topically applied drug product and inform decisions related to product development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.