Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41407919›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

A hybrid approach to Twitter sentiment analysis using integration of ESN ISPBO and BERT.

Zhaojia Chai, Nan Sun, Qingyang Zhang, Navid Razmjooy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zhaojia ChaiInstitute of Language Sciences, Shanghai International Studies University, Shanghai, 201620, China.
Nan SunChangchun Humanities and Sciences College, Changchun, 130117, Jilin, China. sunn425@126.com.
Qingyang ZhangSimon Business School, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, 14627, USA.
Navid RazmjooyIslamic Azad University of Ardabil, Ardabil, Iran. nrazmjooy@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sentiment analysis is an essential component of natural language processing, which focuses on extracting subjective insights, like emotions and opinions from text. In this research, an innovative framework has been introduced for Twitter sentiment analysis that integrates Echo State Networks (ESN), Improved Student Psychology Based Optimization (ISPBO), and BERT embeddings. The proposed ESN-ISPBO-BERT model was evaluated on the SemEval-2016-1 and SemEval-2016-2 datasets and compared against other models, including SVM-Glove, CNN-BERT, LSTM, CNN, KNN, SVM, BERT, and GRU. The outcomes indicate that the suggested model exceeds all baseline models, and has achieved outstanding performance. On SemEval-2016-2, it achieves 98.82% accuracy, 98.79% precision, 98.96% recall, and 98.87% F1-score, while on SemEval-2016-1, it achieves 98.76% accuracy, 98.81% precision, 98.92% recall, as well as 98.86% F1-score. Moreover, the suggested model achieved the values of 98.51%, 98.42%, 98.87%, and 98.64% in terms of accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score on Stanford Sentiment Treebank (SST-2). These outcomes indicate the efficiency of combining reservoir calculating, innovative optimization techniques, and contextual embeddings for the aim of sentiment analysis. The proposed model is a strong solution for the evaluation of Twitter data, with possible applications in brand monitoring, analyzing customer feedback, and tracking sentiment in real-time. This investigation represents the importance of hybrid strategies in tackling the issues of sentiment analysis on social media.

Indexed as

BERTEcho state network (ESN)Improved student psychology based optimizer (ISPBO)Sentiment analysisTwitter

Identifiers

PMID41407919
PMCPMC12824286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.