Articlenpj metabolic health and disease2025
Risk stratification at prediabetes onset and association with diabetes outcomes using EHR data.
Article in npj metabolic health and disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Non-Glycemic Clinical Data for Type 2 Diabetes Detection in Mexican Adults: A Comparative Analysis of Atherogenic Indices, Statistical Transformations, and Machine Learning Algorithms.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prediabetes can progress to type 2 diabetes (T2D), but individual risk varies widely. Few studies have rigorously characterized subgroups at the point of prediabetes (PD) onset. Using electronic health records (EHRs), we developed a machine learning approach to stratify PD and analyze T2D progression risk. We defined PD onset based on strict HbA1c criteria and excluded patients with missing follow-ups or atypical clinical events, yielding a high-fidelity cohort of 14,436 patients from an initial pool of 74,054 (2017-2023, MedStar Health). An XGBoost model using routine features, including HbA1c, BMI, blood pressure, lipids, ALT, medication history, and lifestyle factors, was trained on 2018-2020 data and tested on 2021-2022 patients, achieving an AUC of 81.6%. Risk scores enabled subtyping into high-, medium-, and low-risk groups with distinct progression trajectories. Stratification patterns remained consistent in future cohorts. This approach supports earlier, personalized intervention and diabetes risk prediction using real-world EHR data.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.