ArticleScientific reports2025
Performance evaluation and environmental sustainability assessment of ferrock-infused concrete.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Developing a new type of building material is essential for reducing the carbon footprint of cement in sustainable concrete. This study aims to investigate Ferrock, synthesized from industrial waste, as a partial replacement for cement in concrete. Ferrock was incorporated at dosage levels of 10-50%, with increments of 10% by weight of cement. The mixes were tested for workability, compressive strength, split tensile strength, flexural behaviour, rebound hammer response, rapid chloride penetration test, and elevated temperature resistance up to 600 °C. Microstructural characteristics were examined using Scanning Electron Microscopy and Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy. Pore analysis of the Scanning Electron Microscopy image was performed using ImageJ to assess pore size and area. Response Surface Methodology was applied to optimise the dosages of cement, Ferrock, and oxalic acid, and a predictive strength model was developed. Results show that 10% Ferrock replacement produced the most favourable mechanical performance, with noticeable reductions in strength at higher replacement levels. Durability outcomes also improved at 10% Ferrock, demonstrating significantly lower chloride permeability and enhanced thermal stability compared to control and higher-percentage mixes. An environmental sustainability assessment was conducted under a cradle-to-site boundary for critical indicators, showing that incorporating Ferrock reduces embodied energy, global warming potential, and overall material use costs. Overall, the findings confirm that a 10% Ferrock addition offers an optimal balance of mechanical performance, durability, and environmental benefits, supporting its potential as a low-carbon, cost-effective material that promotes circular economy practices in concrete construction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.