Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41407866›Full record

ReviewNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2026

Re-engineering the disordered mind: clinical experimentation, dynamical systems, and AI for personalized psychiatry.

Mina Kheirkhah, Bita Shariatpanahi, Tim Hahn, Vineet Tiruvadi, Georgia Koppe, Erfan Nozari, Stefan G Hofmann, Hamidreza Jamalabadi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mina KheirkhahDepartment of Psychology, Marburg University, Marburg, Germany.
Bita ShariatpanahiDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Marburg University, Marburg, Germany.
Tim HahnInstitute for Translational Psychiatry, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Vineet TiruvadiDepartment of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Georgia KoppeInterdisciplinary Center for Scientific Computing, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2941-9238
Erfan NozariDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of California, Riverside, CA, USA.
Stefan G HofmannDepartment of Psychology, Marburg University, Marburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3548-9681
Hamidreza JamalabadiDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Marburg University, Marburg, Germany. hamidreza.jamalabadi@uni-marburg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2485-2374

Funding

Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung (Alexander von Humboldt Foundation) Humboldt ProfessuDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) 521379614Von-Behring-Röntgen-Stiftung (Von Behring-Röntgen-Foundation) 70_00038
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This perspective proposes a neuropsychiatric model of psychological and psychiatric interventions by reframing treatment as a control engineering problem grounded in dynamical systems theory and artificial intelligence (AI). We argue that psychopathology arises from distortions in the geometry of underlying neurobehavioral low-dimensional cognitive-affective manifolds rather than from isolated biological dysfunctions, and we use a formal dynamical framework to show how clinical interventions can be modeled as control inputs that reshape the manifold itself to restore healthy dynamics. To operationalize this approach clinically, we propose a closed-loop, N-of-1 experimental paradigm in which dense longitudinal measurements and strategically designed perturbations are used to train individualized AI surrogate models of a person's manifold. This model supports the simulation of counterfactual interventions and guide the design of optimized, personalized treatments. Active perturbation reduces required sample size dramatically, enabling precise modeling from limited but richly sampled individual data. This engineering-inspired framework reconceptualizes clinical improvement as the restoration of regulatory capacity and resilient trajectories rather than the mere reduction of symptom counts. By integrating dynamical systems theory, AI-based surrogate modeling, and adaptive clinical experimentation, we outline a principled pathway toward personalized neuropsychiatry based on dynamical systems theory and AI.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceMental DisordersPrecision MedicinePsychiatryHumans

Identifiers

PMID41407866
PMCPMC12932708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.