Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41407839›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Development of a cost-effectiveness analysis model for Duchenne muscular dystrophy utilizing the national registry in Japan.

Takuro Okada, Hirofumi Komaki, Takami Ishizuka, Mari Oba, Satoko Hori, Harumasa Nakamura

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Takuro OkadaDivision of Drug Informatics, Keio University Faculty of Pharmacy, 1-5-30 Shibakoen, Minato, Tokyo, 105-8512, Japan.
Hirofumi KomakiTranslational Medical Center, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, 4-1-1, Ogawa-Higashi, Kodaira, Tokyo, 187-8551, Japan.
Takami IshizukaDepartment of Clinical Research Support, Clinical Research and Education Promotion Division, National Center Hospital, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, 4-1- 1, Ogawa-Higashi, Kodaira, Tokyo, 187-8551, Japan.
Mari ObaClinical Research and Education Promotion Division, Department of Clinical Epidemiology, National Center Hospital, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, 4-1- 1, Ogawa-Higashi, Kodaira, Tokyo, 187-8551, Japan.
Satoko HoriDivision of Drug Informatics, Keio University Faculty of Pharmacy, 1-5-30 Shibakoen, Minato, Tokyo, 105-8512, Japan.
Harumasa NakamuraDepartment of Clinical Research Support, Clinical Research and Education Promotion Division, National Center Hospital, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, 4-1- 1, Ogawa-Higashi, Kodaira, Tokyo, 187-8551, Japan. hnakamura@ncnp.go.jp.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cost-effectiveness analysis models for Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD)-a rare muscular disease-have been developed based on data from a limited patient population, such as clinical trials. Thus, this study aimed to construct a more robust cost-effectiveness analysis model based on real-world evidence. The model was constructed using the Registry of Muscular Dystrophy (Remudy) database, the national registry of muscular diseases in Japan. Parameters for transition probability and drug cost were estimated based on this registry, and a quality-of-life (QOL) survey was conducted on Remudy-listed patients for utility. A Markov model was adopted using motor functions as outcomes. Age-specific transition probabilities were estimated by fitting a Weibull distribution to Remudy data of 730 patients. For each drug that was dosed according to body weight (BW), drug costs were estimated from the BW information in the Remudy data and direct medical costs were based on Japanese practice guidelines. For utility, QOL values for each state were estimated for 346 patients who consented to the survey. Using a novel approach that leverages the registry's comprehensive epidemiological data and patient's access to research, the refined cost-effectiveness analysis model was developed and this may be fundamental to implementing the health technology assessments of DMD.

Indexed as

Cost-Benefit AnalysisMuscular Dystrophy, DuchenneRegistriesAdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolCost-Effectiveness AnalysisDrug CostsHumansJapanMaleMarkov ChainsQuality of LifeYoung AdultCost-effectiveness analysis modelDuchenne muscular dystrophyPatient registry systemReal-world evidence

Identifiers

PMID41407839
PMCPMC12827352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.