ArticleScientific reports2025
An artificial intelligence-based diagnosis system for the identification of helminth parasitic infections in mithun and allied bovines.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study presents a novel deep learning approach addressing the critical shortage of veterinary expertise in India’s North Eastern Hill (NEH) region through automated identification of parasitic infections in livestock. We developed a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) architecture capable of analyzing both standard and microscopic images to identify and classify 16 distinct parasitic species. The model comprises four convolutional layers (32, 64, 128, 256 filters) with ReLU activation and MaxPooling for efficient feature extraction, followed by Dense layers and a Softmax classifier. The model was trained on a comprehensive dataset of over 5,334 annotated images, achieving 96% accuracy after 30 training epochs. To evaluate stability, it was trained ten times, yielding an average accuracy of 0.9616 ± 0.0024 (95% CI: [0.9601, 0.9630]), Macro F1 of 0.9527 ± 0.0021, and Weighted F1 of 0.9598 ± 0.0019, demonstrating consistent performance. A PHP-based web interface enables real-time predictions and adaptable deployment across hardware and cloud platforms. This system offers a scalable and accessible diagnostic tool for enhancing parasite detection and livestock health monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.