ArticleScientific reports2025
Neural entrainment to visual rules in infant and adult brain.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Visual Rule Learning (RL) is a key cognitive ability allowing the detection and generalization of repetition-based rules in a continuous stream. Most studies on visual RL focus on post-exposure behavioral tasks, missing the learning process dynamics and the individual and age-related differences. Here, for the first time, we used neural entrainment to investigate visual RL, particularly in infants. Thirty adults and 27 nine-month-old infants were exposed to triplets of shapes in an ABA structure for 2 min while recording EEG. Triplets appeared at 6 Hz, with the embedded rule frequency at 2 Hz. Behavioral tests assessed rule discrimination between familiar (ABA) and novel patterns, measuring infants' looking behavior and adults' familiarity judgments. Results revealed a striking infant advantage: infants exhibited greater neural sensitivity to the rule frequency and a faster learning trajectory than adults. Adults showed stronger neural entrainment at the base frequency, particularly in frontal regions, reflecting developmental shifts in endogenous attention and salience processing. Importantly, in infants, neural response increased with repeated ABA exposure, correlating with successful rule discrimination, whereas adults showed no such progression. These findings provide the first evidence of an infant advantage in abstracting patterns from sensory input, supporting a general RL mechanism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.