Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41407796›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

A framework for reconfigurable production line changeover task planning based on large language model.

Jinliang Hou, Li Yan, Hua Qiang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jinliang HouXi'an Technological University, Xi'an, China. houjinliang@st.xatu.edu.cn.
Li YanXi'an Technological University, Xi'an, China.
Hua QiangShaanxi University of Science & Technology, Xi'an, China.

Funding

Shaanxi Qinchuangyuan "Scientists+Engineers" Team Construction Project 2025QCY-KXJ-048
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Addressing the issues of manual intervention, low efficiency, and high error rates in the changeover operations of reconfigurable production lines, this paper proposes an automatic changeover task planning framework for reconfigurable production lines based on Large Language Model(LLM). Utilizing this framework, the instructions input by the user can be interpreted, and the changeover robot can be controlled to automatically complete the changeover of the production line.The framework is primarily composed of five essential components: knowledge graph, high-level task planner, low-level task planner, changeover robot, and reconfigurable production line. The knowledge graph is utilized to depict the attributes and interrelationships of products, processes, tool & fixture tool & fixture resources, and programs of the reconfigurable production line.The semantic instructions input by the user are interpreted by the high-level task planner, which then decomposes the task into changeover subtasks, matches robot skills to each subtask, and generates a sequence of skills. With the low-level task planner, the sequence of skills is translated into executable code for the changeover robot, which controls the robot to complete the automatic changeover task. A low-code industrial software is designed to implement skill-based modular programming, and the four-layer control architecture including the physical, control, skill, and application layers has been implemented. The changeover robot was designed and fabricated. Through single-robot task planning experiment and actual production line changeover task planning experiment, the correctness of the proposed changeover task planning framework is demonstrated, automatic changeover of the production line can be realized.

Identifiers

PMID41407796
PMCPMC12828037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.