Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41407791›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2025

Effect of core stability exercises and Russian electrical stimulation on nonspecific low back pain: a single-blinded randomized controlled trial.

Noura Nayel, Hesham Ezzat, Sabreen Ahmed, Haitham Saleh

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06495099 (Effect of Core Stability Exercises and Russian Electrical Stimulation in Non-specific Low Back Pain), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06495099 nacompletednot on this map

Effect of Core Stability Exercises and Russian Electrical Stimulation in Non-specific Low Back Pain (Randomized Control Trail)

TypeinterventionalSponsorDeraya UniversityRan2024 to 2024Enrolled50ConditionsLow Back PainArmsRussian electrical stimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Noura NayelDepartment of Physical Therapy for Basic Science, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Deraya University, Minya, Egypt.
Hesham EzzatDepartment of Physical Therapy for Basic Science, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Deraya University, Minya, Egypt. hesham.ezzat@deraya.edu.eg.
Sabreen AhmedDepartment of Human Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Deraya University, Minya, Egypt.
Haitham SalehDepartment of Physical Therapy for Basic Science, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Deraya University, Minya, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nonspecific low back pain (NSLBP) is a predominant contributor to disability worldwide. Core stability exercises (CSEs) serve as a common intervention; however, their therapeutic effects may be augmented through the incorporation of adjunct modalities such as neuromuscular electrical stimulation. This randomized controlled trial aimed to evaluate whether the addition of Russian current (RC) stimulation to a CSE regimen enhances improvements in pain, functional capacity, muscle thickness, and spinal stability among patients diagnosed with NSLBP compared with a regimen comprising CSE alone. This single-blinded, randomized controlled trial was conducted at the outpatient clinic of Deraya University over a six-week intervention period. A total of fifty patients aged between 20 and 25 years with chronic NSLBP were recruited. The participants were randomly allocated into two groups via a closed-envelope. Group 1 (the study group, n = 25) received CSE and RC three times a week for six weeks, whereas Group 2 (the control group, n = 25) received CSE only. The primary outcomes assessed included pain intensity, measured via the visual analog scale (VAS), and functional disability, evaluated via the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). The secondary outcomes included the muscle thicknesses of the transversus abdominis (TrA) and lumbar multifidus (LM), which were measured via ultrasonography, and lumbar spine stability, which was assessed via a Spinal Mouse device. The data were analyzed via mixed-model MANOVA for group and time effects, accompanied by post hoc Bonferroni correction. Between-group comparisons were performed via independent t tests, whereas within-group analyses were performed via paired t tests. There was a significant decrease in the VAS score and ODI and a significant increase in the stability score, TrA, and LM thickness, especially in group 1. The demographic characteristics of the groups were comparable at baseline (p > 0.05). Compared with Group 2 (CSE alone), Group 1 (CSE + RC) exhibited significantly greater improvements in the VAS score (MD: -1.04, 95% CI: -1.79–0.29, p = 0.008), ODI (MD: -9.76%, 95% CI: -12.13–7.39, p < 0.001), stability score (MD: 7.53%, 95% CI: 0.95–14.12, p = 0.02), and muscle thickness (e.g., right TrA: MD: 0.08 cm, 95% CI: 0.02–0.12, p = 0.004). There was a significant decrease in the VAS score and ODI and an increase in the stability score, TrA, and LM thickness, especially in group 1. Compared with core stability exercises alone, the Russian current accompanied by core stability exercises results in greater decreases in pain and disability and greater increases in functional ability, TrA and LM thickness, and lumbar spine stability.Trial registration: The study was registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT06495099) on 02/07/2024.

Indexed as

Electric Stimulation TherapyExercise TherapyLow Back PainAdultFemaleHumansMalePain MeasurementSingle-Blind MethodTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultCore stability exercisesLow back painMuscle strengthRandomized controlled trialRussian electrical stimulation therapy

Identifiers

PMID41407791
PMCPMC12715220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.