ArticleScientific reports2025
Experimental study of CO
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study examines the potential of Saudi red mud for CO₂ sequestration through mineral carbonation and its concurrent hydrogen generation. Two batch experiments were conducted under neutral (deionized water) and acidic (1 wt% HCl) conditions at elevated temperature and pressure. Under neutral conditions, the interaction between CO₂ and red mud led to measurable mineralization, with approximately 8.3% of the injected CO₂ converted into Minerals. In contrast, the acidic system induced extensive mineral dissolution and precipitation, releasing higher concentrations of reactive elements into solution. Increasing the amount of red mud in the reaction to twice that used in the DIW case resulted in approximately twice the amount of CO₂ being mineralized. This indicates a strong relationship between red mud mass and its CO₂ sequestration capacity, highlighting that providing more reactive solid material directly enhances the system’s ability to lock CO₂ into stable carbonate minerals. Gas analysis verified hydrogen generation, along with notable hydrogen sulfide formation, particularly under acidic conditions. Overall, the findings reveal that while red mud can facilitate partial CO₂ mineralization and hydrogen evolution, its reactivity strongly depends on pH, with acid-assisted reactions enhancing mineral mobility rather than stable carbonate formation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.