ArticleScientific reports2025
HOES: an efficient multi-evolutionary expert system for deep learning model optimization in time series prediction.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Time series prediction is widely applied in transportation management, energy scheduling, and weather forecasting, with deep learning emerging as a dominant approach due to its powerful temporal feature extraction capabilities. However, the predictive performance of deep learning models heavily depends on training strategies, while traditional optimization methods suffer from limited efficiency, ultimately affecting model performance. To address this issue, this study designs a Hybrid Optimization Expert System (HOES) based on six evolutionary algorithms to optimize deep learning models for time series prediction. HOES integrates multiple evolutionary algorithms and employs a transmission mechanism, memory system, and punishment system to achieve collaborative optimization. Specifically, the transmission mechanism enhances global search capability, the memory system preserves historically optimal solutions to prevent search degradation, and the punishment system eliminates ineffective optimization strategies; together, these mechanisms improve optimization efficiency. Experiments on six public datasets-Traffic, Weather, Household, Wind Power, Solar Power, and ETT_m1 demonstrate that HOES enhances predictive accuracy and convergence rate. SJ-LSTM is used for validation as a representative time-series forecasting model. Specially, on the Solar power dataset, the HOES-optimized SJ-LSTM model achieved a 24% reduction in RMSE, a 30% reduction in MAE, compared to suboptimal algorithm. These findings indicate that HOES significantly enhances the global optimization capability of deep learning models, mitigates the risk of local optima, which is also well-suited for complex time series prediction tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.