ArticleNature communications2025
Structure-dynamics decoupling in soft-colloid suspensions.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The accepted paradigm in materials science is that the internal structure of a material determines its macroscopic properties. This connection is reflected in the particle dynamics, which are known to become slower at length scales comparable to the mean interparticle distance. This implies that the q-dependent relaxation time, with q the magnitude of the scattering wave vector, correlates with the structure factor of the material. This is known as de Gennes narrowing in simple atomic liquids, and is a behavior also seen in colloidal suspensions, where the quantities at play are more easily accessible experimentally. We here find that this familiar correlation can breakdown for soft-colloid suspensions. In both experiments and simulations, we find that the q-dependent relaxation time of the suspension does not follow the structure factor, but that instead, it remains unchanged relative to the length scale at which it is measured. We justify this unusual behavior by alluding to single-particle elasticity and how this aspect allows additional relaxation pathways for the characteristic time of the suspension to remain unaffected by the suspension structure. Our findings challenge the prevailing wisdom that the structure of a material unequivocally determines its properties.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.