Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41407710›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

ER degradation for ER

Erika Hamilton, Rachel M Layman, David Cosgrove, Michael Danso, Hui Zhang, Wei He, Su Young Kim, Jie Fan, Manish R Patel

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05654532 (A Phase I Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Preliminary Anti-Tumor Activity of AC699 in Patients With Estrogen Receptor Positive/Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Negative), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05654532 phase1active not recruitingnot on this map

A Phase I Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Preliminary Anti-Tumor Activity of AC699 in Patients With Estrogen Receptor Positive/Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Negative (ER+/HER2-) Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorAccutar Biotechnology IncRan2022 to 2026Enrolled100ConditionsBreast CancerArmsAC699
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Erika HamiltonSarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN, USA. erika.hamilton@scri.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1911-0336
Rachel M LaymanMD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8663-0331
David CosgroveNorthwest Cancer Specialists, Vancouver, WA, USA.
Michael DansoVirginia Oncology Associates, Norfolk, VA, USA.
Hui ZhangAccutar Biotechnology Inc., Cranbury, NJ, USA.
Wei HeAccutar Biotechnology Inc., Cranbury, NJ, USA.
Su Young KimAccutar Biotechnology Inc., Cranbury, NJ, USA.
Jie FanAccutar Biotechnology Inc., Cranbury, NJ, USA. jiefan@accutarbio.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-5497-0512
Manish R PatelSarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

AC699 is a novel, orally bioavailable chimeric estrogen receptor-α (ERα) degrader that induces proteasome-dependent ERα degradation via cereblon E3 ligase recruitment. Here we report findings from a first-in-human, phase 1, dose-escalation study of once-daily AC699 (100-600 mg) in patients with heavily-pretreated, locally-advanced/metastatic ER-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05654532). Primary objectives are to assess dose-limiting toxicities and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Secondary objectives are to evaluate pharmacokinetics, objective response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR, including stable disease ≥24 weeks), duration of response (DOR), and progression-free survival (PFS). Among 37 treated patients, TEAEs occurred in 78% of patients, most commonly nausea (19%), fatigue (16%), and neutropenia (16%). All treatment-related adverse events were Grade 1/2, with no dose reductions/discontinuations; the maximum tolerated dose was not reached. Of 26 efficacy-evaluable patients, 4 (15%) achieved partial responses and CBR was 23%. In exploratory analysis of patients with ESR1 mutations, ORR and CBR were 40% and 45%, respectively. Median DOR and PFS were 6.5 and 3.6 months overall, and 6.5 and 7.4 months in ESR1-mutant patients. AC699 steady-state exposure increased approximately dose-proportionally between 100-400 mg, plateauing at 600 mg. AC699 demonstrated favorable safety, predictable PK, and encouraging antitumor activity, particularly in ESR1-mutant disease.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsBreast NeoplasmsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesEstrogen Receptor alphaAdultAgedFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisProgression-Free SurvivalProteolysisTreatment OutcomeAntineoplastic AgentsERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesESR1 protein, humanEstrogen Receptor alpha

Identifiers

PMID41407710
PMCPMC12824232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.