Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41407694›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Comprehensive benchmarking of methods for mutation calling in circulating tumor DNA.

Hanaé Carrié, Ngak Leng Sim, Pui Mun Wong, Anna Gan, Yi Ting Lau, Polly Poon, Saranya Thangaraju, Iain Tan, Yoon Sim Yap, Kiran Krishnamachari and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Hanaé CarriéGenome Institute of Singapore (GIS), Agency for Science, Technology, and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3271-6540
Ngak Leng SimGenome Institute of Singapore (GIS), Agency for Science, Technology, and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, Singapore.
Pui Mun WongGenome Institute of Singapore (GIS), Agency for Science, Technology, and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7155-0638
Anna GanGenome Institute of Singapore (GIS), Agency for Science, Technology, and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, Singapore.
Yi Ting LauGenome Institute of Singapore (GIS), Agency for Science, Technology, and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-7363-0541
Polly PoonGenome Institute of Singapore (GIS), Agency for Science, Technology, and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-4771-9065
Saranya ThangarajuGenome Institute of Singapore (GIS), Agency for Science, Technology, and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, Singapore.
Iain TanGenome Institute of Singapore (GIS), Agency for Science, Technology, and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4951-0354
Yoon Sim YapNational Cancer Center Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0347-5066
Kiran KrishnamachariGenome Institute of Singapore (GIS), Agency for Science, Technology, and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7261-6811
Limsoon WongDepartment of Computer Science, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1241-5441
Anders SkanderupGenome Institute of Singapore (GIS), Agency for Science, Technology, and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, Singapore. skanderupamj@a-star.edu.sg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6847-4980

Funding

Ministry of Health -Singapore (MOH) OFIRG21nov-0083
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Detection of somatic mutations in cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is challenging due to low variant allele frequencies and extensive DNA degradation. Here we develop a benchmarking strategy using longitudinal patient-matched cfDNA samples from individuals with colorectal and breast cancer. Samples with high and ultra-low levels of tumor-derived DNA are combined into controlled dilution series that preserve the properties of authentic cell-free DNA, including each patient's germline and blood-cell mutation backgrounds. Using deep whole-genome (150x) and exome (2,000x) sequencing, we define a reference set of ~37,000 single nucleotide variants and ~58,000 indels to benchmark nine somatic variant callers across varying ctDNA levels and sequencing depths. We also explore machine learning-based tuning of individual callers and identify features that improve accuracy in cfDNA. This benchmarking resource clarifies the detection limits of current approaches and provides practical guidance for selecting somatic variant calling methods in liquid biopsy applications.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCirculating Tumor DNAColorectal NeoplasmsMutationBenchmarkingDNA Mutational AnalysisExomeFemaleHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansLiquid BiopsyMachine LearningPolymorphism, Single NucleotideCirculating Tumor DNA

Identifiers

PMID41407694
PMCPMC12852940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.