ArticleNature communications2025
Peptidoglycan recruitment by a penicillin binding protein.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The cell wall is essential for bacterial survival. Its core component is peptidoglycan (PG), a polymer comprised of disaccharide-peptides (stem peptides) that are cross-linked to one another via transpeptidation by penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs). While much is known about how PBPs are inactivated by β-lactam antibiotics, little is known about how PBPs bind and catalyze the transpeptidation of PG. Here we show how native PG and stem peptides are recruited to PBP5 of E. faecium, a critical ESKAPE pathogen. We discovered that PG binds PBP5 at the periphery of the PBP active site cleft, not the active site, and that the D-Ala leaving group contributes minimally to PBP binding. We show that β-lactam antibiotics and stem peptides can bind PBP5 simultaneously. We also show that only the single central residue of the stem peptide (L-Lys substituted by D-iAsn in E. faecium) is both necessary and sufficient for peptide recruitment. Finally, we translate our molecular findings by demonstrating that recruitment binding variants are unable to create a PG cell wall in E. faecium. Our studies define the key molecular interactions that govern bacterial cell wall formation and provide opportunities for the development of antibiotics that do not rely on PBP inactivation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.