ArticleBMJ open2025
Changes and contributions to the gender pay gap in surgery in Canada: a repeated cross-sectional analysis from 1996 to 2020.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesOccupational gender segregation is a contributing factor to gender pay inequity in medicine but has not been thoroughly characterised. We assessed the historical relationship between surgeon sex, type of work and value of procedural payments. We hypothesised that female surgeons perform lower-paying procedures as a group, and that this could be seen both with broad historical overview and with focused analysis of major operative procedures in a specific year.
designWe conducted repeated cross-sectional studies using public payment data from the Canadian Institute for Health Information. We calculated average payment per service by sex and service category and used linear regression to assess the association between proportion of female surgeons performing a procedure and payment value per procedure for 41 major procedures in 2019-2020.
participantsSurgeons in 10 Canadian jurisdictions from 1996 to 1997 (5459) to 2019-2020 (8069).
resultsThe proportion of female surgeons increased over the study period from 10.5% (n=575) in 1996-1997 to 28.7% (n=2314) in 2019-2020. The sex gap in the average payment per service narrowed but persisted. A greater proportion of women's earnings came from non-procedural work in consultation and visits (43% for women vs 36% for men in 2019-2020) while a greater proportion of men's earnings was from procedural work in major surgery (23% for women vs 38% for men in 2019-2020). There was an inverse relationship between proportion of women performing a procedure and payment value such that for one percent increase in female proportion, the procedural payment was CAD$1.77 lower.
conclusionsOur findings suggest that women receive fewer procedural payments than men and tend to perform lower paying procedures. Reforms to referral systems and billing codes can help address root causes for the gender pay gap in surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.