Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41407418›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Comparing microlearning and flipped classroom methods to enhance arterial blood gas interpretation learning in nurse anaesthesia students using Kirkpatrick's evaluation model: a study protocol.

Shaghayegh Miri, Afzal Shamsi, Sajad Yarahmadi, Elham Shahidi Delshad

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shaghayegh MiriDepartment of Anesthesia, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran (the Islamic Republic of).ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-6788-9880
Afzal ShamsiDepartment of Anesthesia, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran (the Islamic Republic of).
Sajad YarahmadiSocial Determinants of Health Research Center, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Lorestan University of Medical Sciences, Khorramabad, Iran (the Islamic Republic of).ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5187-9831
Elham Shahidi DelshadDepartment of Anesthesia, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran (the Islamic Republic of) eshahididelshad@tums.ac.ir.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1767-6619

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionToday, arterial blood gas (ABG) testing is widely used in various hospital departments to support diagnosing diseases and predicting patient conditions. However, interpreting the numerical results of this test, its complex concepts continue to pose challenges for nurses and physicians. Therefore, the use of innovative educational approaches can simplify the learning of ABG interpretation. Two educational approaches that have recently received attention are the Flipped classroom and Microlearning. To evaluate and compare these approaches, we will develop a comprehensive evaluation protocol based on Kirkpatrick's model. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study is a quasi-experimental design that will involve 188 undergraduate nurse anaesthesia students at Tehran University of Medical Sciences, randomly allocated to a flipped classroom or microlearning groups (94 per group). The intervention will consist of one session for all registered students and three sessions for each group with their own educational approach. Two sets of educational content, according to each approach method, will be developed based on a needs assessment and will be shared via secure social media. The flipped classroom group will receive pre-session materials, followed by in-person classes. The microlearning group will engage in in-person sessions supported by micro videos, podcasts and micro games delivered via Telegram. Effectiveness will be evaluated by using Kirkpatrick's four-level model. 1 week after the intervention concludes, participants will be invited to a meeting to complete the Training Satisfaction Rating scale (Level 1, Reaction). We will use a pre-test and a post-test for evaluating Level 2 (Learning). Level 3 (Behaviour) will be evaluated through observations of ABG interpretation at internship sites. Level 4 (Results) will be evaluated via semi-structured interviews with specialists and colleagues. Data will be analysed blind; normality will be assessed (Kolmogorov-Smirnov test), and appropriate statistical tests (t-tests, ANCOVA, χ ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study received permission and ethical approval from Tehran University of Medical Sciences (IR.TUMS.SPH.REC.1404.08). Since the study is not clinical, obtaining a trial registration number is not required under Iranian research policy, and an ethical approval alone is sufficient. Informed consent will be obtained before participants are enrolled. The study's results will ultimately be submitted as a research paper to a peer-reviewed journal.

Indexed as

Blood Gas AnalysisEducation, Nursing, BaccalaureateNurse AnesthetistsStudents, NursingHumansIranModels, EducationalRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicEDUCATION & TRAINING (see Medical Education & Training)KnowledgeNursesNursing research

Identifiers

PMID41407418
PMCPMC12716525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.