ArticleAnnals of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery : official journal of the Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons of Asia2025
Postoperative Lung Function after Robotic- versus Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Lobectomy for Lung Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Study.
Article in Annals of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery : official journal of the Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons of Asia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- RoboticJournal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Clinical research advances in thoracic surgery and thoracic oncology in 2025: a panoramic narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeRobotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) has emerged as an alternative to video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for lobectomy in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). While perioperative and oncologic outcomes have been studied, limited data exist on long-term postoperative pulmonary function. This study compared pulmonary function one year after RATS versus VATS lobectomy.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 298 patients who underwent lobectomy for early-stage NSCLC between September 2020 and August 2023. After applying exclusion criteria, 186 patients remained: 128 in the VATS group and 58 in the RATS group. Propensity score matching (1:1) yielded 55 matched pairs. Pulmonary function parameters-%predicted forced vital capacity (%FVC), %predicted forced expiratory volume in one second (%FEV1), %predicted peak expiratory flow (%PEF), and %predicted diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (%DLco)-were evaluated one year postoperatively.
resultsNo significant differences were observed between groups in any pulmonary function parameters at one year, both before and after matching. Lung function was similarly preserved.
conclusionsDespite the use of more ports, RATS lobectomy did not result in inferior pulmonary function compared to VATS. Given its higher cost, VATS may remain the more cost-effective standard, although RATS offers a promising platform for future innovation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.