ArticleInternal medicine (Tokyo, Japan)2026
Validity of a Toilet Seat for Automated Classification of Stool Form Using Falling Stool Sensing.
Article in Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective Monitoring the condition of stool is useful for daily health management and early detection of diseases; however, a self-assessment of stool form is often inaccurate. To address this issue, TOTO, developed a prototype toilet seat equipped with a sensor that classifies stool forms according to the Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS). This study aimed to verify the accuracy of this method for distinguishing stool types. Methods We recruited 38 healthy Japanese participants and obtained BSFS data using the device from November 2021 to March 2022. Meanwhile, we taught the participants how to assess their own stool using the BSFS and used their assessments as reference standards. We evaluated the strength of agreement between the participants' assessments and the device's classification results using the kappa coefficient, as well as the strength of correlation using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. Materials We analyzed 305 samples from 38 participants after excluding 62 samples for which the participant's judgment was unreliable or the device data were of a low quality. Results The kappa coefficient between participants' assessments and the device's classification results based on BSFS was 0.55 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.45-0.65, p<0.001], while the Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was 0.56 (95% CI 0.48-0.63, p<0.001). Conclusion The device appeared to possess limited but moderate validity, with fair to good agreement and moderate correlation with the participants' assessment results. This toilet seat with an automated classification of stool form by sensing falling stool may support daily healthcare and early disease detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.