ArticleClinical pharmacology and therapeutics2026
Axatilimab Immunogenicity and Clinical Relevance in Patients with Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease.
Article in Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Axatilimab, a monoclonal antibody targeting colony-stimulating factor 1 (CSF-1) receptor, is approved in the US for the treatment of chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) after failure of ≥2 lines of systemic therapy. In this study, the effects of antidrug antibody (ADA) status on the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, efficacy, and safety of axatilimab were evaluated. Among the 319 assessable participants, including 276 participants with cGVHD, 109 (34.2%) were treatment-emergent ADA-positive, with ADA onset occurring within the first month of treatment for 60.8% of treatment-induced ADA-positive participants. Among the 93 patients with cGVHD and treatment-emergent ADAs, 47 (50.5%) patients were neutralizing antibody (NAb)-positive, with NAb onset mostly occurring within the first 6 months of treatment. Samples that were ADA-negative were generally associated with higher axatilimab trough concentrations compared with ADA-positive samples, especially at later time points. Changes in CSF-1 based on ADA status were consistent with changes in axatilimab exposure. In contrast, nonclassical monocyte levels were similar regardless of ADA or NAb status, suggesting that immunogenicity did not affect nonclassical monocytic cell concentrations. No differences in overall response, ≥7-point improvement in modified Lee Symptom Scale responses, or duration of response were observed between the different ADA and NAb subgroups. The incidence of safety events was generally consistent across ADA and NAb subgroups. In conclusion, no meaningful differences in pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, efficacy, and safety were observed between subgroups of axatilimab-treated participants with different ADA statuses. These results suggest that the development of ADAs and NAbs should not affect treatment decisions with axatilimab.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.