ReviewClinical pharmacology and therapeutics2026
Guided Sample Pooling in Human Mass Balance Studies: A Recommended Strategic Decision Framework.
Review in Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advances in Human Mass Balance Studies: An IQ Consortium Perspective on Current Practices and Emerging Trends.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Radiolabeled human mass balance studies are crucial for identifying circulating metabolites and understanding drug absorption, excretion, and clearance pathways. Metabolite profiling involves quantifying all drug-related entities, including parent drug and metabolites in plasma and excreta, using extended liquid chromatography methods coupled with detection through scintillation counting, accelerator mass spectrometry, or non-radiolabeled approaches. Given the labor-intensive nature of sample extraction and analysis, we propose a new paradigm that maximizes gathering information through sample pooling strategies. Our proposal introduces sample pooling strategies by integrating both individual and pooled sample schemes, simplifying decisions, and consolidating existing knowledge into a cohesive document. This aligns with the low statistical power typically associated with mass balance studies that dose six to eight subjects. In metabolite profiling, it is common practice to pool samples either from the limited number of subjects participating in a human mass balance study or from different time points of sample collection. This approach improves efficiency while preserving data integrity. Pooling reduces resource constraints and enables the concentration of samples with relatively low radioactivity levels, resulting in higher quality metabolite profiles. Nevertheless, there are situations when analyzing samples from individual subjects or time points may be preferred. This proposal presents guidance and decision trees designed to facilitate informed decisions about sample pooling to maximize data quality of metabolite profiling in human mass balance studies while efficiently managing resources. These recommendations stem from discussions within the mass balance working group of the IQ Consortium.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.