ArticleJournal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction2026
Endometriosis phenotypes and staging in relation to lipid biomarkers: Findings from the ENDO Cohort Study.
Article in Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEndometriosis has been linked to cardiometabolic alterations, but whether these associations vary by disease severity or phenotype is unclear. We examined lipid profiles across endometriosis diagnosis, stage, and typology. MATERIAL AND
methodsData came from 476 women in the NICHD ENDO cohort. Endometriosis was confirmed laparoscopically and staged using the rASRM criteria (I-IV). Typology was categorized as superficial endometriosis (SE), ovarian endometrioma (OE), deep infiltrating endometriosis (DE), and OE+DE. We compared endometriosis status, stage (I/II vs III/IV), and typology to no endometriosis using adverse lipid thresholds (total cholesterol ≥200 mg/dL, HDL <50 mg/dL, LDL ≥100 mg/dL, triglycerides ≥175 mg/dL, non-HDL ≥130 mg/dL, VLDL ≥30 mg/dL, ApoA1 <125 mg/dL, and ApoB ≥120 mg/dL). Adjusted prevalence ratios (aPR) and 95 % CIs were estimated via generalized linear models, controlling for age, race/ethnicity, BMI, income, marital status, and serum cotinine.
resultsEndometriosis diagnosis alone was not associated with adverse lipid profiles. In contrast, moderate/severe disease showed higher prevalence of elevated triglycerides (aPR= 2.27; 95 % CI: 1.18,4.35) and VLDL (aPR= 2.41; 95 % CI: 1.50, 3.85). Typology revealed stronger patterns: OE and OE+DE were associated with adverse profiles across multiple markers (aPRs 1.59-4.09), particularly ApoB and triglycerides. Minimal/mild disease and SE were not associated.
conclusionsThe metabolic signal was phenotype-driven rather than diagnosis-driven, with severe stage and OE/OE+DE showing clear associations with adverse lipid profiles. These findings suggest lipid profiles may serve as markers of phenotype severity or shared biological milieu. Replication in larger cohorts is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.