ArticleNeurointervention2026
Transulnar Arterial Access for Intra-Operative Cerebral Angiography during Prone Cerebrovascular Surgery.
Article in Neurointervention, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Utility of Bilateral Upper Extremity Arterial Access for Complex Neurovascular Intervention and Diagnostic Cervicocerebral Angiography: A Unique Single-Center Experience.Journal of neuroendovascular therapy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We reviewed our experience using transulnar access (TUA) to obtain intraoperative cerebral angiography during prone surgery for vascular pathology, where conventional transfemoral and transradial access can be difficult. Ten consecutive patients treated between April 2020 and August 2025 were included. Ulnar artery access was obtained in the supine position before the patient was turned prone for surgery, and angiography was performed after the procedure without repositioning. Eight patients had arteriovenous malformations and 2 had dural arteriovenous fistulas. In all cases, intraoperative angiography was successfully completed through the ulnar artery. The mean ulnar artery diameter was 2.4 mm, indicating adequate vessel size for catheterization, and mean fluoroscopy time was 7.5 minutes. No immediate access-site complications occurred, and no case required conversion to another access route. These findings suggest that TUA is technically feasible and may provide a practical option for intraoperative cerebral angiography when prone positioning limits access to traditional arterial sites. Although the study is limited by its small sample size and retrospective design, the consistent procedural success supports further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.