ReviewPediatrics2026
Advances in Pediatric Therapeutic Drug Monitoring.
Review in Pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is indicated for drugs with narrow therapeutic indices, whereby clinicians can adjust drug dosing to promote efficacy while limiting toxicity risk. Such monitoring is particularly important in managing infectious diseases, as both patient- and organism-specific factors must be considered to achieve optimal clinical responses. Innovation in pediatric TDM lags behind adults, largely due to a paucity of data and feasibility issues with lab draws and pharmacy resources. Emerging techniques in pharmacokinetic (PK) modeling, PK study design, flexible sampling strategies, and reduced sample volume requirements are particularly promising for TDM advancement in neonates and children. In this article, we discuss recent advancements in vancomycin TDM as a model case. Vancomycin is commonly used to treat serious gram-positive infections in children, and monitoring was historically performed using trough concentration-based guidance. Emerging data suggest that vancomycin troughs are not reliable surrogates for efficacy or toxicity and that trough-based monitoring is associated with increased risk of nephrotoxicity without clinical benefits. The area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) is the optimal pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic metric to measure overall vancomycin exposures, and consensus infectious diseases and pharmacist society guidance has formally recommended a shift toward AUC-based monitoring and away from trough-based monitoring in all age groups-including in neonates and children. We compare approaches to TDM in infectious diseases and summarize the body of literature describing application of vancomycin AUC-guided monitoring in children and neonates. Finally, we highlight opportunities and potential barriers to implementation of AUC-guided TDM in pediatric populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.